From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44896 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752497AbaFFPww (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:52:52 -0400 Message-ID: <5391E3D0.8050608@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:52:48 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karel Zak , Gui Hecheng CC: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] mount: add btrfs to mount.8 References: <1401933919-23608-1-git-send-email-guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140605080311.GW9000@x2.net.home> <1402036359.17740.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20140606094428.GA30975@x2.net.home> <20140606100302.GB30975@x2.net.home> In-Reply-To: <20140606100302.GB30975@x2.net.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/6/14, 5:03 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:44:28AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: >> I personally have no problem to maintain information about arbitrary >> FS in mount.8, the problem are updates. Unfortunately, kernel FS developers >> don't care about the man page at all and it's very often not up to date. > > Hmm.. another possible way would be to create a script for util-linux > that will analyze kernel Documentation/filesystems/.txt and > report changes that is necessary to make to mount.8. It should be > relative simple with git. I'll try it.. I like that idea. Maybe will need a defined format, though, right? Maybe asciidoc? I've still been meaning (in theory) to produce a mount manpage just for xfs. I'm still willing to do that if the above doesn't pan out. I just need to get to it. I'd be happy to do it for extN as well. -Eric > Karel >