From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>, kreijack@inwind.it
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: some project ideas: NFS4 ACLs, resilience on the same device, allowing to specify which devices are "distinct" in a RAID
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 10:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5392CC86.3060009@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402104897.18904.12.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net>
On 06/07/2014 03:34 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 19:03 +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> There is (was ?) a project to address that: richacl
>> http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/. This is not a btrfs project, but a
>> linux kernel project because from a filesystem POV the
>> implementation requires to store some information in a extended
>> attributes: the check is performed at the VFS level.
>
>>> Now one could create a RAID5 on them, but apparently sda1 and
>>> sda2 are on the same disk... so I'd like a way to tell btrfs that
>>> these are the "same" and not really that redundant.
>>
>> Hugo Mill worked on something related to that [1]
>>
>> [1] "Thoughts on RAID nomenclature"
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg33782.html
>
>
> Thanks for the info... should I put those 3 ideas to the
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas page? Or is
> that just meant to be edited by the developers?
>
You can add new ideas to the wiki pages, supporting by link and other info were available. This is the real nature of the wiki pages.
However I am still convinced richacl/nfs4 acl are not strictly related to a specific filesystem.
BR
> Cheers, Chris.
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-07 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-02 17:44 some project ideas: NFS4 ACLs, resilience on the same device, allowing to specify which devices are "distinct" in a RAID Christoph Anton Mitterer
2014-06-03 17:03 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-07 1:34 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2014-06-07 8:25 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-06-14 2:40 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5392CC86.3060009@libero.it \
--to=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).