linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix race condition between btrfs and udev
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:23:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399474A.3040003@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402488698-12518-1-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>


Wang,

> Futher, a easy way to trigger this problem is by running the following
> c codes repeatedly:
>
>   int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   {
>   	/* pass a btrfs block device */
>   	int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_EXCL);
> 	if (fd < 0) {
> 		perror("fail to open: %s", strerror(errno));
> 		exit(1);
> 	}
> 	close(fd);
> 	return 0;
>   }
>
> So the problem is RW opening would trigger udev event which will
> call btrfs_scan_one_device().


> In btrfs_scan_one_device(), it
> would open the block device with EXCL flag..meanwhile if another
> program try to open that device with O_EXCL, it would fail with
> EBUSY.

  Expected. But do we need O_EXCL in kernel:btrfs_scan_one_device()
  at all ?

> This happen seldomly in the real world, but if we use loop device
> for test, we may hit this annoying problem.

> A walkaround way to solve this problem is to wait kernel scanning
> finished and then try it again.

  I agree this happens seldom in production. But I don't agree on
  something to fix as workaround.

  Just sent out the patch:
      btrfs: looping mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> may fail with EBUSY

  which I believe can be a final fix. Your review / tests appreciated.


Thanks, Anand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-12  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-11 12:11 [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix race condition between btrfs and udev Wang Shilong
2014-06-11 12:23 ` Tomasz Torcz
2014-06-12  6:23 ` Anand Jain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5399474A.3040003@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).