linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Konstantinos Skarlatos <k.skarlatos@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit 762380a "block: add notion of a chunk size for request merging" stops io on btrfs
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:02:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A1B82A.4040906@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A13DE9.4020001@gmail.com>

On 2014-06-18 00:21, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote:
> On 18/6/2014 5:11 πμ, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2014-06-17 14:35, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> with 3.16-rc1  rsync stops writing to my btrfs filesystem and stays at a
>>> D+ state.
>>> git bisect showed that the problematic commit is:
>>>
>>> 762380ad9322951cea4ce9d24864265f9c66a916 is the first bad commit
>>> commit 762380ad9322951cea4ce9d24864265f9c66a916
>>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
>>> Date:   Thu Jun 5 13:38:39 2014 -0600
>>>
>>>      block: add notion of a chunk size for request merging
>>>
>>>      Some drivers have different limits on what size a request should
>>>      optimally be, depending on the offset of the request. Similar to
>>>      dividing a device into chunks. Add a setting that allows the driver
>>>      to inform the block layer of such a chunk size. The block layer
>>> will
>>>      then prevent merging across the chunks.
>>>
>>>      This is needed to optimally support NVMe with a non-zero stripe
>>> size.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
>>
>> That's odd, should not have any effect since nobody enables stripe
>> sizes in the kernel. I'll double check, perhaps it's not always being
>> cleared.
>>
>> Ah wait, does the attached help?
>
> Yes, it works! I recompiled at commit
> 762380ad9322951cea4ce9d24864265f9c66a916 with your patch and it looks
> ok. Rebooted back to the unpatched kernel and the bug showed up again
> immediately.
>
> The funny thing is that the problem only showed on my (multi-disk) btrfs
> filesystem. / which is on ext4 seems to work fine.

Probably because the multi-disk setup doesn't have hw_sectors set, I'm 
guessing. But great, I'll get this upstream asap. Thanks for testing!

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <53A0B491.1040901@gmail.com>
2014-06-17 21:38 ` commit 762380a "block: add notion of a chunk size for request merging" stops io on btrfs Konstantinos Skarlatos
2014-06-18  2:11 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-18  7:21   ` Konstantinos Skarlatos
2014-06-18 16:02     ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A1B82A.4040906@fb.com \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=k.skarlatos@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).