From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Lockups with btrfs on 3.16-rc1 - bisected
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:51:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A31514.8030308@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A2573B.1060901@hp.com>
On 06/18/2014 11:21 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 10:11 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> On 06/18/2014 10:03 PM, Marc Dionne wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Marc
>>> Dionne<marc.c.dionne@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Waiman Long<waiman.long@hp.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/18/2014 08:03 PM, Marc Dionne wrote:
>>> And for an additional data point, just removing those
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC ifdefs looks like it's sufficient to prevent
>>> the symptoms when lockdep is not enabled.
>> Ok, somehow we've added a lock inversion here that wasn't here before.
>> Thanks for confirming, I'll nail it down.
>>
>> -chris
>>
>
> I am pretty sure that the hangup is caused by the following kind of code
> fragment in the locking.c file:
>
> if (eb->lock_nested) {
> read_lock(&eb->lock);
> if (eb->lock_nested && current->pid == eb->lock_owner) {
>
> Is it possible to do the check without taking the read_lock?
I think you're right, we haven't added any new recursive takers of the
lock. The path where we are deadlocking has an extent buffer that isn't
in the path yet locked. I think we're taking the read lock while that
one is write locked.
Reworking the nesting a big here.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 20:57 Lockups with btrfs on 3.16-rc1 - bisected Marc Dionne
2014-06-18 22:17 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 22:27 ` Josef Bacik
2014-06-18 22:47 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 23:10 ` Josef Bacik
2014-06-18 23:19 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 23:27 ` Chris Mason
2014-06-18 23:30 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 23:53 ` Chris Mason
2014-06-19 0:03 ` Marc Dionne
2014-06-19 0:08 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-19 0:41 ` Marc Dionne
2014-06-19 2:03 ` Marc Dionne
2014-06-19 2:11 ` Chris Mason
2014-06-19 3:21 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-19 16:51 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2014-06-19 17:52 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-19 20:10 ` Chris Mason
2014-06-19 21:50 ` Chris Mason
2014-06-19 23:21 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-20 3:20 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2014-06-21 1:09 ` Long, Wai Man
2014-06-19 9:49 ` btrfs-transacti:516 blocked 120 seconds on 3.16-rc1 Konstantinos Skarlatos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A31514.8030308@fb.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.c.dionne@gmail.com \
--cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).