From: Alin Dobre <alin.dobre@elastichosts.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock/high load
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:22:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A45FBE.6040306@elastichosts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5399C40F.3070509@elastichosts.com>
On 12/06/14 16:15, Alin Dobre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem that triggers quite often on our production machines. I
> don't really know what's triggering this or how to reproduce it, but the
> machine enters in some sort of deadlock state, where it consumes all the
> i/o and the load average goes very high in seconds (it even gets to over
> 200), sometimes in about a minute or even less, the machine is
> unresponsive and we have to reset it. Rarely, the load just stays high
> (~25) for hours, but it never gets down again, but this happens rarely,
> as I said. In general, the machine is either already unresponsive or is
> about to become unresponsive.
>
> The last machine that encountered this has 40 cores and the btrfs
> filesystem is running over SSDs. We encountered this on a plain 3.14
> kernel, and also on the latest 3.14.6 kernel + all the patches whose
> summary is marked "btrfs:" that made it in 3.15, straight forward
> backported (cherry-picked) to 3.14.
>
> Also, no suspicious (malicious) activity from the running processes either.
>
> I noticed there was another report on 3.13 which was solved by a 3.15rc
> patch, it doesn't seem to be the same thing.
>
> Since the only chance to obtain something was via a SysRq dump, here's
> what I could get from the last "w" trigger (tasks that are in
> uninterruptable (blocked) state), showing only tasks that are related to
> btrfs:
I tried to reproduce this on a slower/older machine with older SSDs and
couldn't get anywhere, the machine stood up. However, when I tried one
of our faster/newer machine also with newer and faster SSDs, I managed
to reproduce it twice.
I should mention that the disks are set up in a MD RAID6, and btrfs
single for both data and metadata is on top of that. I ran bonnie++ to
reproduce it (bonnie++ -d /home/bonnie -s 4g -m test -r 1024 -x 100 -u
bonnie) inside a container that was memory capped to 1GB (hence the -r
1024) with the help of cgroups.
Just before the machine stopped being fully responsive I had 3 processes
that were consuming 100% CPU: md128_raid6, btrfs-transact,
kworker/u82:6. The load was fairly low, but atop stopped working at ~5
load average.
I couldn't dump the sysrq blocked processes this time, but the above 3
processes are also in my initial report.
As per Liu Bo's request, the output of the df command is:
Data, single: total=73.01GiB, used=28.05GiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=3.01GiB, used=1.04GiB
unknown, single: total=368.00MiB, used=0.00
at the moment when atop was already unresponsive.
Another thing to mention is that our production machines also have a
fairly high traffic of snapshotting (or plain creation, more rarely) and
deletion operations on subvolumes that are quota enabled.
Cheers,
Alin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 15:15 Deadlock/high load Alin Dobre
2014-06-13 3:37 ` Liu Bo
2014-06-13 6:46 ` Alin Dobre
2014-06-13 6:50 ` Alin Dobre
2014-06-20 16:22 ` Alin Dobre [this message]
2014-06-27 16:12 ` Alin Dobre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A45FBE.6040306@elastichosts.com \
--to=alin.dobre@elastichosts.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).