From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Btrfs: fix race of using total_bytes_pinned
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:16:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B3CDE8.10603@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404291481-31773-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:58:01 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> This percpu counter @total_bytes_pinned is introduced to skip unnecessary
> operations of 'commit transaction', it accounts for those space we may free
> but are stuck in delayed refs.
>
> And we zero out @space_info->total_bytes_pinned every transaction period so
> we have a better idea of how much space we'll actually free up by committing
> this transaction. However, we do the 'zero out' part a little earlier, before
> we actually unpin space, so we end up returning ENOSPC when we actually have
> free space that's just unpinned from committing transaction.
>
> xfstests/generic/074 complained then.
>
> This fixes it by actually accounting the percpu pinned number when 'unpin',
> and since it's protected by space_info->lock, the race is gone now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
> v4: Remove unnecessary check in btrfs_check_data_free_space.
> v3: Really account the percpu pinned number when unpin, instead of zeroing
> it out, as we set transaction with UNBLOCKED before 'unpin', zeroing it
> out may end up with messing percpu pinned number(suggested by Miao).
> v2: Add missing brakets for if statement
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 99c2539..813537f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -5678,7 +5678,6 @@ void btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_caching_control *next;
> struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
> struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
> - struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
>
> down_write(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>
> @@ -5701,9 +5700,6 @@ void btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>
> up_write(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(space_info, &fs_info->space_info, list)
> - percpu_counter_set(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, 0);
> -
> update_global_block_rsv(fs_info);
> }
>
> @@ -5741,6 +5737,7 @@ static int unpin_extent_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 end)
> spin_lock(&cache->lock);
> cache->pinned -= len;
> space_info->bytes_pinned -= len;
> + percpu_counter_add(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, -len);
> if (cache->ro) {
> space_info->bytes_readonly += len;
> readonly = true;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 8:58 [PATCH v4] Btrfs: fix race of using total_bytes_pinned Liu Bo
2014-07-02 9:16 ` Miao Xie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B3CDE8.10603@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).