From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] btrfs: remove unnecessary error check
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:35:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BF3F71.1010703@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BE94C6.6000502@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
(2014/07/10 22:27), Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 7/10/14, 1:44 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>> (2014/07/10 12:26), Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 9, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
>>>> obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
>>>> "(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
>>>>
>>>
>>> True, but now a comment like:
>>>
>>> /* Handle ENOSPC */
>>>
>>> might still be nice...
>>
>> Eric, thank you for your comment. I fixed my patch.
>> How about is it?
>
> One other thing I missed the first time, I'm sorry, notes below:
>
>>
>> ===
>> From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
>> obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
>> "(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> index 3668048..115aac3 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> @@ -3803,22 +3803,23 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
>> if (!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC)
>> return trans;
>>
>> - if (PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC) {
>> - u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
>> + /* Handle ENOSPC */
>>
>> - trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
>> - if (IS_ERR(trans))
>> - return trans;
>> - ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
>> - &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
>> - num_bytes, 5);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
>> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> - }
>> - trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
>> - trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
>> + u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
>
> This variable should be declared at the beginning of the function,
> not in the middle, because it's no longer in a separate code block.
OK, moved.
>
> Also, somehow by the time the patch got here, tabs turned into
> 4 spaces, so this one wouldn't apply for me.
I did't realize that. Thank you.
>
> Sorry for missing the variable declaration problem the first time!
No problem, more review is welcome. THank you very much :-)
This is the v3 patch.
===
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
"(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 3668048..e7ac779 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3790,6 +3790,7 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
{
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
+ u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
int ret;
/*
@@ -3803,22 +3804,21 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
if (!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC)
return trans;
- if (PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC) {
- u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
+ /* Handle ENOSPC */
- trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(trans))
- return trans;
- ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
- &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
- num_bytes, 5);
- if (ret) {
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- }
- trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
- trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
+ trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans))
+ return trans;
+ ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
+ &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
+ num_bytes, 5);
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
+ trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
+ trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
+
return trans;
}
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 3:19 [PATCH] btrfs: remove unnecessary error check Satoru Takeuchi
2014-07-10 3:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-07-10 6:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Satoru Takeuchi
2014-07-10 13:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-07-11 1:35 ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2014-07-11 14:23 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BF3F71.1010703@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).