From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>,
Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Subject: Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:04:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D166C6.2070403@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557956.045aK4K0qS@merkaba>
On 07/24/2014 02:49 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014, 10:58:51 schrieb Chris Mason:
>> On 07/23/2014 06:47 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014, 17:08:27 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
>>>> Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014, 09:21:40 schrieb Chris Mason:
>>>>> On 07/14/2014 05:58 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>>>>> Am Montag, 14. Juli 2014, 16:12:22 schrieb Chris Mason:
>>>>>>> On 07/14/2014 11:10 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Montag, 14. Juli 2014, 17:04:22 schrieben Sie:
>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While with 3.16-rc3 and rc4 I didn´t have a BTRFS hang in several
>>>>>>>>> days
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> usage, with 3-16-rc5 I had a hang again. Less than a hour since
>>>>>>>>> booting
>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since the hang bug I and others had with 3.15 and upto 3.16-rc2
>>>>>>>>> usually
>>>>>>>>> didn´t happen that quickly after boot and since backtrace looks a
>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>> different from what I have in memory, I post this in a new thread.
>>>>>>>>> See thread "Blocked tasks on 3.15.1" for a discussion of previous
>>>>>>>>> hang
>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably good to add some basic information on the filesystem:
>>>>>>> Do you have compression enabled? I wasn't able to nail down the
>>>>>>> 3.15.1
>>>>>>> hang before vacation attacked me, but I'm hoping to track it down
>>>>>>> today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. I have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It just hung again while I was playing PlaneShift.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back to 3.16-rc4 as rc5 seems to be broke here.
>>>>>
>>>>> The btrfs hang you're hitting goes back to 3.15. So 3.16-rc4 vs rc5
>>>>> shouldn't be a factor. Are you hitting other problems with 3.16?
>>>>
>>>> So far for this day 3.16-rc4 behaves nicely. With 3.16-rc5 I had a BTRFS
>>>> hang twice yesterday. 3.16-rc4 before also behaved nicely for several
>>>> days
>>>> or well about a week here.
>>>
>>> 3.16-rc4 now hung as well…
>>
>> Liu Bo has a promising patch:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4618421/&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=6%2FL0lzzDhu0Y1hL9xm%2BQyA%3D%3D%0A&m=CJPREifRDOxlzhYeURx75h33LGU7YemJsNeLP%2FvXCv8%3D%0A&s=8fb0a70afce09530f16ea66a47d2af07966706b21281a7142d86256979013bab
>>
>> Please give it a shot. There's a second deadlock reading the free space
>> cache, I'm still working on that one too.
>
> Now running 3.16-rc6 + current git + this patch.
>
> It may take some time tough cause during compiling the kernel BTRFS hung
> again, which caused loss of KDE Baloo desktop search file index and parts of a
> mail I wrote in KMail.
>
> Since the patch mentioned ENOSPC issues but the filesystem has enough free
> space according to df I shrunk the trees with
Thanks for giving it a try. The ENOSPC mentioned here is looking for a
contiguous extent, so it's easily possible to trigger that enospc
without actually being full.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-14 15:04 BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-14 15:10 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-14 17:51 ` Duncan
2014-07-14 22:03 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-15 2:45 ` Duncan
2014-07-14 20:12 ` Chris Mason
2014-07-14 21:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-15 13:21 ` Chris Mason
2014-07-15 15:08 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-23 22:47 ` BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4) Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-24 14:58 ` Chris Mason
2014-07-24 16:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-24 18:49 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-24 20:04 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2014-07-28 22:57 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-25 2:32 ` Duncan
2014-07-25 3:06 ` Nick Krause
[not found] ` <20140725080244.GA31950@carfax.org.uk>
2014-07-25 9:13 ` Hugo Mills
2014-07-28 13:20 ` David Sterba
2014-07-25 10:07 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-25 4:51 ` Torbjørn
[not found] ` <20140725092800.GC25859@localhost.localdomain>
2014-07-25 10:22 ` Torbjørn
[not found] ` <53D23AF1.9010704@skagestad.org>
2014-07-25 11:37 ` Torbjørn
2014-07-25 16:14 ` Torbjørn
2014-07-28 10:00 ` Liu Bo
2014-07-28 11:11 ` Torbjørn
2014-07-29 10:18 ` Liu Bo
2014-07-29 15:07 ` Torbjørn
2014-07-30 5:09 ` Liu Bo
2014-07-18 7:51 ` BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-18 13:36 ` Chris Mason
2014-07-19 17:59 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-07-19 18:39 ` Chris Mason
2014-07-19 19:00 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D166C6.2070403@fb.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=dev@codyps.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).