From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:23302 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753468AbaHUIle (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:41:34 -0400 Message-ID: <53F5B18B.1030801@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:44:59 +0800 From: Anand Jain MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Sandeen , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: remove full /dev scanning References: <53F51F4D.2090203@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53F51F4D.2090203@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: A long time back there was an attempt to remove it but this avoided it. Pls ref to the link in this discussion. https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg27272.html Thanks, Anand On 08/21/2014 06:21 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > btrfs fileystem show and btrfs device scan today both have > the "-d" option to scan everything under /dev. But we also > have a mechanism to scan everything in /proc/partitions, which > should always be sufficient. > > If anyone knows why we'd find something deep under /dev but > not in /proc/partitions, speak now or forever hold your peace... > > Tested this by running through a matrix of -d, -m, or "" args > for show/scan, for a 2-device fs, with and without a symlinked > device, with and without a symlinked mountpoint. All output was > identical. > > Thanks, > -Eric > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >