From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: marvin24@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: init uninitialized output buf for btrfs-restore
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:29:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F761C9.5050300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408592136-7606-1-git-send-email-guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 8/20/14, 10:35 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> A memory problem reported by valgrind as follows:
> === Syscall param pwrite64(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
> When running:
> # valgrind --leak-check=yes btrfs restore /dev/sda9 /mnt/backup
>
> Because the output buf size is alloced with malloc, but the length of
> output data is shorter than the sizeof(buf), so valgrind report
> uninitialised byte(s).
> We could use calloc to repalce malloc and clear this WARNING away.
>
> Reported-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sorry for the noise in reply to this, I think the patch itself
is fine. It would have clarified things to the reviewer, though,
if you had added more detail to the commit log, such as:
> If a btrfs-restore process encounters corruption and fails
> to properly decompress all data, some parts of the output
> buffer may not be initialized. This was reported by valgrind as
> follows:
> === Syscall param pwrite64(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
> When running:
> # valgrind --leak-check=yes btrfs restore /dev/sda9 /mnt/backup
>
> Because the output buf size is alloced with malloc, but the length of
> output data is shorter than the sizeof(buf), so valgrind reports
> uninitialised byte(s).
>
> We could use calloc to replace malloc to ensure that all written
> bytes are initialized.
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Thanks,
-Eric
> ---
> cmds-restore.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds-restore.c b/cmds-restore.c
> index cbda6bb..bb72311 100644
> --- a/cmds-restore.c
> +++ b/cmds-restore.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int copy_one_inline(int fd, struct btrfs_path *path, u64 pos)
> }
>
> ram_size = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi);
> - outbuf = malloc(ram_size);
> + outbuf = calloc(1, ram_size);
> if (!outbuf) {
> fprintf(stderr, "No memory\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int copy_one_extent(struct btrfs_root *root, int fd,
> }
>
> if (compress != BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE) {
> - outbuf = malloc(ram_size);
> + outbuf = calloc(1, ram_size);
> if (!outbuf) {
> fprintf(stderr, "No memory\n");
> free(inbuf);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-22 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 3:35 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: init uninitialized output buf for btrfs-restore Gui Hecheng
2014-08-21 8:14 ` Marc Dietrich
2014-08-21 9:43 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-08-21 18:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-21 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 7:35 ` Marc Dietrich
2014-08-22 15:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F761C9.5050300@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marvin24@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).