From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <dsterba@suse.cz>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when read dev super
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5417C886.7020601@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915114436.GD9715@twin.jikos.cz>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when
read dev super
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: <dsterba@suse.cz>, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>,
<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Date: 2014年09月15日 19:44
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:36:12PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> We've got a report of mismatched checksum and bisected to this patch.
> ...
>> But then I don't see the point of the patch, the code would just use a
>> bigger temprary buffer for no apparent reason, the outcom is the same.
> Scatch that, the patch seems in line with what kernel does and there
> must be another reason of the mentioned bug.
That's OK。
But I am somewhat interesting about the report of mismatched csum.
Would you like to share some of the details?
Thanks,
Qu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 9:36 [PATCH 0/4] Add superblock checksum check for btrfs-progs Qu Wenruo
2014-07-03 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when read dev super Qu Wenruo
2014-09-15 11:36 ` David Sterba
2014-09-15 11:44 ` David Sterba
2014-09-16 5:20 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2014-07-03 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs-progs: Allow btrfs_read_dev_super() to read all 3 super for super_recover Qu Wenruo
2014-07-03 17:48 ` David Sterba
2014-07-03 9:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs-progs: Add more meaningful return value for btrfs_read_dev_super() and corresponding error string Qu Wenruo
2014-07-03 17:50 ` David Sterba
2014-07-03 9:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs-progs: Fix malloc size for superblock Qu Wenruo
2014-07-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add superblock checksum check for btrfs-progs David Sterba
2014-07-04 1:10 ` Qu Wenruo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-03 9:35 Qu Wenruo
2014-07-03 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when read dev super Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5417C886.7020601@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).