From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:12328 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbaIPFUK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5417C886.7020601@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when read dev super References: <1404380198-25948-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> <1404380198-25948-2-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140915113612.GC9715@twin.jikos.cz> <20140915114436.GD9715@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140915114436.GD9715@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] btrfs-progs: Check superblock's checsum when read dev super From: David Sterba To: , Qu Wenruo , Date: 2014年09月15日 19:44 > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:36:12PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> We've got a report of mismatched checksum and bisected to this patch. > ... >> But then I don't see the point of the patch, the code would just use a >> bigger temprary buffer for no apparent reason, the outcom is the same. > Scatch that, the patch seems in line with what kernel does and there > must be another reason of the mentioned bug. That's OK。 But I am somewhat interesting about the report of mismatched csum. Would you like to share some of the details? Thanks, Qu > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html