From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.153.30]:63166 "EHLO mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754617AbaIZM4o (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:56:44 -0400 Message-ID: <5425627E.8000300@fb.com> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:56:30 -0400 From: Josef Bacik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner , Eryu Guan CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] xfstests: new btrfs stress test cases References: <1411019379-8104-1-git-send-email-eguan@redhat.com> <20140925053907.GC4758@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140925053907.GC4758@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/25/2014 01:39 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > Btrfs developers, > > Can someone who knows how this is all supposed to work pass an eye > over this patch series to determine the validity of what is being > tested? Given the number of problems this patchset seems to expose, > it looks pretty important to me to get this into all of your regular > testing. I can't make judgement on whether the tests are valid > things to do to btrfs, so I'm reliant on people with actual btrfs > expertise to vet these patches... > Yeah sorry Dave I've been meaning to get to this, I'll go through them all today. Thanks, Josef