From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Bob Marley <bobmarley@shiftmail.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What is the vision for btrfs fs repair?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:29:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5438DC47.7000901@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5437BAB2.1040605@shiftmail.org>
On 10/10/2014 12:53 PM, Bob Marley wrote:
>>
>> If true, maybe the closest indication we'd get of btrfs stablity is
>> the default enabling of autorecovery.
>
> No way! I wouldn't want a default like that.
>
> If you think at distributed transactions: suppose a sync was issued
> on both sides of a distributed transaction, then power was lost on
> one side, than btrfs had corruption. When I remount it, definitely
> the worst thing that can happen is that it auto-rolls-back to a
> previous known-good state.
I cannot agree. I consider a sane default to have a consistent state with
"the recently data written lost", instead of "require the user
intervention to not lost anything".
To address your requirement, we need a "super sync" command which
ensure that the data are in the filesystem and not only
in the log (as sync should ensure).
BR
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-11 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 19:11 What is the vision for btrfs fs repair? Eric Sandeen
2014-10-09 11:29 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 11:53 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 11:55 ` Hugo Mills
2014-10-09 12:07 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 12:12 ` Hugo Mills
2014-10-09 12:32 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
[not found] ` <107Y1p00G0wm9Bl0107vjZ>
2014-10-09 12:34 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 13:18 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-09 13:49 ` Duncan
2014-10-09 15:44 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <0zvr1p0162Q6ekd01zvtN0>
2014-10-09 12:42 ` Duncan
2014-10-10 1:58 ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-10 3:20 ` Duncan
2014-10-10 10:53 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 10:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-10-10 11:12 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 15:18 ` cwillu
2014-10-10 14:37 ` Chris Murphy
2014-10-10 17:43 ` Bob Marley
2014-10-10 17:53 ` Bardur Arantsson
2014-10-10 19:35 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-10 22:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-13 11:26 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-12 10:14 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-12 23:59 ` Duncan
2014-10-13 11:37 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-10-13 11:48 ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-11 7:29 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-11-17 20:55 ` Phillip Susi
2014-10-12 10:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-12 10:17 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-10-13 21:09 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5438DC47.7000901@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=bobmarley@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).