linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs random filesystem corruption in kernel 3.17
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:03:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <543D9DA9.50702@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$67a58$c42f6156$af002a14$c1094f5a@cox.net>

On 10/14/2014 02:35 PM, Duncan wrote:
> But at some point, presumably after a fix is in place, since the damaged
> snapshots aren't currently always deletable, if the fix only prevents new
> damage from occurring and doesn't provide a way to fix the damaged ones,
> then mkfs would be the only way to do so.  With the damage limited to
> those snapshots and not spreading to normal writable snapshots or the
> working copy, dropping everything to do that mkfs isn't urgent, but it
> (the mkfs) will need to be done at some point to clear the undeletable
> snapshots, again, assuming the fix doesn't provide a way to get rid of
> them (the currently undeletable snapshots).


What happens if "btrfs property set" is used to (attempt to) promote the 
snapshot from read-only to read-write? Can the damaged snapshot then be 
subjected to scrub of btrfsck?

e.g.

btrfs property set /path/to/snapshot ro false
(maintenance here)


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-14 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <DC336054-F307-4A86-AD6D-204E700DE9AA@prnet.org>
2014-10-07 13:19 ` btrfs send and kernel 3.17 Chris Mason
2014-10-07 20:45   ` David Arendt
2014-10-07 20:46     ` Chris Mason
2014-10-12 11:11       ` David Arendt
2014-10-12 15:24         ` john terragon
2014-10-12 21:35           ` David Arendt
2014-10-13  4:11             ` David Arendt
2014-10-13 12:40               ` john terragon
2014-10-13 15:40                 ` David Arendt
2014-10-13 17:22         ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-13 20:27           ` btrfs random filesystem corruption in " David Arendt
2014-10-13 20:42             ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-13 22:36               ` Duncan
2014-10-14 11:17                 ` admin
2014-10-14 21:35                   ` Duncan
2014-10-14 22:03                     ` Robert White [this message]
2014-10-14 22:55                       ` Duncan
2014-10-14 17:00                 ` David Arendt
2014-10-13 20:48             ` john terragon
2014-10-13 20:55               ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-13 20:57                 ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-13 21:22                 ` john terragon
2014-10-13 21:25                   ` David Arendt
2014-10-13 21:49                     ` Duncan
2014-10-13 23:18                   ` Rich Freeman
2014-10-14  1:30                     ` john terragon
2014-10-13 21:22               ` David Arendt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=543D9DA9.50702@pobox.com \
    --to=rwhite@pobox.com \
    --cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).