From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.153.30]:26478 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753263AbaJQSZz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:25:55 -0400 Message-ID: <54415F1C.1060902@fb.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:25:32 -0400 From: Josef Bacik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petr Janecek , CC: Subject: Re: Poll: time to switch skinny-metadata on by default? References: <20141017123036.GA8052@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20141017123036.GA8052@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/17/2014 08:30 AM, Petr Janecek wrote: > Hello, > >> the core of skinny-metadata feature has been merged in 3.10 (Jun 2013) >> and has been reportedly used by many people. No major bugs were reported >> lately unless I missed them. > > so far I haven't succeeded running btrfs balance on a large > skinny-metadata fs -- segfault, kernel bug, reproducible. No such > problems on ^skinny-metadata fs (same disks, same data). Tried both > several times on 3.17. More info in comments 10,14 in > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id%3D64961&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=cKCbChRKsMpTX8ybrSkonQ%3D%3D%0A&m=3qxE39iiu%2BoZB%2F05dE7hnGHZojWhjjijrtjNYki0NFg%3D%0A&s=b262347a1ad2505ebdcb21dcc9f0944a14c174a1dcf447746ce196faddd99092 > > I can't reproduce this, how big is your home directory, and are you still seeing corruptions after just rsyncing to a clean fs? Thanks, Josef