From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Petr Janecek <janecek@ucw.cz>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs-progs release 3.17
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:13:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5448B8A5.2010202@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141023065709.GA11511@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Some of the disks on my system were missing and I was able to hit
this issue.
----------------
Check tree block failed, want=12582912, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Couldn't read chunk root
warning devid 2 not found already
Check tree block failed, want=143360, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Couldn't read chunk root
warning, device 4 is missing
warning, device 3 is missing
warning, device 2 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
----------------
Did a bisect and it leads to this following patch.
----------------
commit 915902c5002485fb13d27c4b699a73fb66cc0f09
btrfs-progs: fix device missing of btrfs fi show with seed devices
----------------
Also this patch stalls ~2sec in the cmd btrfs fi show, on my system
with 48 disks.
Also a simple test case hits some warnings...
----------------
mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs && fillfs /btrfs 100 && umount /btrfs
wipefs -a /dev/sdb
modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /btrfs
btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 9844cd05-1c8c-473e-a84b-bac95aab7bc9
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 1.59MiB
devid 2 size 967.87MiB used 104.75MiB path /dev/sdc
*** Some devices missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
----------------
On 10/23/14 14:57, Petr Janecek wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> You have mentioned two issues when balance and fi show running
>> concurrently
>
> my mail was a bit chaotic, but I get the stalls even on idle system.
> Today I got
>
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> parent transid verify failed on 1559973888000 wanted 1819 found 1821
> Ignoring transid failure
> leaf parent key incorrect 1559973888000
>
> from 'btrfs fi sh' while I was just copying something, no balance running.
>
> [...]
>> [PATCH 1/1] btrfs-progs: code optimize cmd_scan_dev() use
>> btrfs_register_one_device()
>> [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: introduce btrfs_register_all_device()
>> [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: optimize btrfs_scan_lblkid() for multiple calls
>>
>> If you could, pls..
>> Now on 3.17 apply above 3 patches and see if you see any better
>> performance for the stalling issue.
>
> no perceptible change: takes ~40 seconds both before and after
> applying. Old version <1 sec.
>
>> can you do same steps on 3.16 and report what you observe
>
> So many rejects -- do you have older versions of these patches?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Petr
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 21:28 Btrfs-progs release 3.17 Petr Janecek
2014-10-22 0:32 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-22 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-23 6:57 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-23 8:13 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2014-10-23 8:52 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-23 13:23 ` Petr Janecek
2014-10-28 3:56 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-23 13:36 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-28 4:03 ` Gui Hecheng
2014-10-28 8:42 ` Anand Jain
2014-10-28 9:43 ` Gui Hecheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-20 16:54 David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5448B8A5.2010202@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=janecek@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox