linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>, <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs, add test for snapshoting after file write + truncate
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:45:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5464D20B.3040101@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414323543-31557-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@suse.com>

On 10/26/2014 07:39 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Regression test for a btrfs issue where if right after the snapshot
> creation ioctl started, a file write followed by a file truncate
> happened, with both operations increasing the file's size, the created
> snapshot would capture an inconsistent state of the file system tree.
> That state reflected the file truncation but it didn't reflect the
> write operation, and left a gap between two file extent items (and
> that gap corresponded to the total or a partial area of the write
> operation's range).
>
> This issue was fixed by the following linux kernel patch:
>
>      Btrfs: fix snapshot inconsistency after a file write followed by truncate
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Ran with and without the patch applied to make sure it did the right 
thing, the test looks sane.  Thanks for this

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 10:13 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs, add test for snapshoting after file write + truncate Filipe Manana
2014-10-26 11:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Filipe Manana
2014-11-10  1:45   ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 15:45   ` Josef Bacik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5464D20B.3040101@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).