From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:35371 "EHLO mail-qg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932134AbaKRQ0y (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:26:54 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q108so404364qgd.30 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:26:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <546B7329.4080007@ubuntu.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:26:17 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc MERLIN CC: Brendan Hide , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: scrub implies failing drive - smartctl blissfully unaware References: <546AF572.2020101@swiftspirit.co.za> <20141118153526.GS20972@merlins.org> <546B6DF0.5090306@ubuntu.com> <20141118161115.GW20972@merlins.org> In-Reply-To: <20141118161115.GW20972@merlins.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2014 11:11 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote: > That seems to be the case, but hdrecover will rule that part out at > least. It's already ruled out: if the read failed that is what the error message would have said rather than a bad checksum. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJUa3MpAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwmu4H+IPNwUZMEES7vvA7WTPcrYgw mO2x9uR/fQJFH1u4Urf3anKXoifsHUgvgyPHotRrm1OoiB3bQgYVapVEqZ0PEkre la3zKydJ6ZuCa/TuEvATdOxBwvUhMKJCYcwYheja+1stqEBxD8mj6HY5+HqufoLo VaSeEeBDWvQZtGrOC8JNxfzaeFmf46W+8dQIn7qI72WYvWRfVMhCun+dR4amS8hN cXgxAe6ElnVV4TuGHLy0n4l2Hr6oWBYLWIJhDzM9IpkfjX9jsv78nLHcoWwtaw82 gv248OcCeLnZBwoN5Tepd5Av6uHh3x9MzlXDrqnWQBWulY3f0idrFGU1y1uZvw== =AtDf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----