From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:12778 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbaKVWGw (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:06:52 -0500 Message-ID: <547108FB.9070507@ubuntu.com> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:06:51 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert White , Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: scrub implies failing drive - smartctl blissfully unaware References: <546AF572.2020101@swiftspirit.co.za> <20141118153526.GS20972@merlins.org> <47FB8035-FEA6-40E1-9672-5BBF92B283A9@colorremedies.com> <546BB2EA.5080809@ubuntu.com> <546CC04F.6040207@ubuntu.com> <546D0609.9040105@pobox.com> <546D0FEA.5000608@ubuntu.com> <546D18D9.60201@pobox.com> <546E4E6A.3060208@ubuntu.com> <546E6F19.40806@pobox.com> <546F5631.5050701@ubuntu.com> <546FAAD2.80608@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <546FAAD2.80608@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/21/2014 04:12 PM, Robert White wrote: > Here's a bug from 2005 of someone having a problem with the ACPI > IDE support... That is not ACPI "emulation". ACPI is not used to access the disk, but rather it has hooks that give it a chance to diddle with the disk to do things like configure it to lie about its maximum size, or issue a security unlock during suspend/resume. > People debating the merits of the ACPI IDE drivers in 2005. No... that's not a debate at all; it is one guy asking if he should use IDE or "ACPI" mode... someone who again meant AHCI and typed the wrong acronym. > Even when you "get me" for referencing windows, you're still > wrong... > > How many times will you try get out of being hideously horribly > wrong about ACPI supporting disk/storage IO? It is neither "recent" > nor "rare". > > How much egg does your face really need before you just see that > your fantasy that it's "new" and uncommon is a delusional mistake? Project much? It seems I've proven just about everything I originally said you got wrong now so hopefully we can be done. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUcQj4AAoJENRVrw2cjl5RwmcH+gOW0LUQE4OXEToMY33brK8Z QMKw7T1y4dtXIeeWihugNs+vbwmoI2Wheeej4WPdiqvgqIfX4ov9+N9Nb39JiIsI 7frPJ638n98Et5sirCGKfaVvDTwlF85ApHHtXrVLg2dBY3A+oLM9jVU7jpRBvW1m IFjhJH/SMGDpMhix9SFg6w6cALRh1U5WYV4zMZ1f5/ri/05TYmNJ/M23cjtBicPZ LaIFxOMGef4lylysNaVh0W03424oIJit6d7DB1gxCyjnkUvVuJ43NjuS5ay+y2sP FFrepKrOfhK1oOib9e63zNfRHhWrX4KN0Dqcu/3+/+lhD3q5G1fd4YK2RV/oaso= =nm9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----