Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent issues with btrfs fi df
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 07:19:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481A2D0.2050203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548161FE.3030301@jp.fujitsu.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3121 bytes --]

On 2014-12-05 02:42, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi Austin,
>
> (2014/12/04 23:31), Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> I've recently noticed on some of my systems, that btrfs fi df
>> doesn't consistently show all of the chunk types.
>> I'll occasionally not see the GlobalReserve, or even anything
>> but System,
>
> For one Btrfs file system, "how inconsistent" is the same even if
> time passes? In other word,
>
>   a) Once "GlobalReserve" becomes to be not shown, it keep as is
>      after tha, or
>   b) Oneday "GlobalReserver" disappeared. Howevert it appear again
>      at the next day or so.
>
In general, once it changes the first time, things don't seem to change
again afterwards.
>> although the behavior seems to be consistent for
>> a given filesystem.
>
> Did you confirm the following things for your Btrfs file system?
>
>   a) btrfs scrub finishes without any problem, and
>   b) dmesg doesn't show any suspicious message.
>
Scrub and dmesg both look fine, I've also run btrfsck in no-op mode and
that doesn't report any errors either.
>> I'm using btrfs-progs 3.17.1 and kernel 3.17.4
>> with grsecurity patches (although with much of the grsec stuff disabled)
>> on all such systems.  I'd be happy to provide kernel .config or other
>> information for debugging on request.
>
> Could you tell me the following information, if possible?
>
>   - mkfs options and mount options
In both cases that I currently have access to, I created the fs with:
mkfs.btrfs -O extref,skinny-metadata,no-holes -F <device-name>
and the mount option strings for the devices in question are:
noatime,space_cache,ssd,autodefrag
for /
and:
noatime,sync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,compress=zlib,ssd,space_cache,autodefrag for
/boot
>   - The output of btrfs fi df
For /, I get:
  Data, single: total=43.00GiB, used=40.76GiB
  System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
  Metadata, DUP: total=1.50GiB, used=1.05GiB
For /boot, I get:
  System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
>   - .config
I've attached a gzipped copy.
>   - Any possible trigger to cause this problem
There aren't any that I know of.
>   - Btrfs specific operations, for example weekly btrfs scrub
I run scrub weekly, and balance and fstrim as needed.
>   - Do you have any system which works fine and uses a kernel
>     without grsecurity patches?
Yes, although said system has exclusively multi-device filesystems,
while the affected one is all single device filesystems.
>
> In addition, running one of your system with
>
>   - upstream kernel without grsecurity, and
>   - btrfs file system with which btrfs fi df works correctly,
>
I've got a recovery environment built using buildroot that is based on
the same kernel version without grsec patches, I'll reboot into that and
see what it says.
> can help to distinguish whether the problem comes from
> upstream kernel (of course it includes btrfs) or grsecurity.
> I'm not sure about grsecurity. however, I have encountered
> many problems caused by security modules.
I do have one other local kernel patch that I use, I've attached that as
well, although it should have no effect whatsoever on the fs code.



[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 32360 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: change-vt-number.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 759 bytes --]

diff -rU3 linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h /usr/src/linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h
--- linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h	2014-10-01 14:20:45.855383160 -0400
+++ /usr/src/linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h	2014-08-03 18:25:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
  * resizing).
  */
 #define MIN_NR_CONSOLES 1       /* must be at least 1 */
-#define MAX_NR_CONSOLES	63	/* serial lines start at 64 */
-#define MAX_NR_USER_CONSOLES 63	/* must be root to allocate above this */
+#define MAX_NR_CONSOLES	15	/* serial lines start at 64 */
+#define MAX_NR_USER_CONSOLES 15	/* must be root to allocate above this */
 		/* Note: the ioctl VT_GETSTATE does not work for
 		   consoles 16 and higher (since it returns a short) */
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-05 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-04 14:31 Recent issues with btrfs fi df Austin S Hemmelgarn
     [not found] ` <548161FE.3030301@jp.fujitsu.com>
2014-12-05 12:19   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2014-12-05 12:35     ` Austin S Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5481A2D0.2050203@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox