From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent issues with btrfs fi df
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 07:19:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481A2D0.2050203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548161FE.3030301@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3121 bytes --]
On 2014-12-05 02:42, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi Austin,
>
> (2014/12/04 23:31), Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> I've recently noticed on some of my systems, that btrfs fi df
>> doesn't consistently show all of the chunk types.
>> I'll occasionally not see the GlobalReserve, or even anything
>> but System,
>
> For one Btrfs file system, "how inconsistent" is the same even if
> time passes? In other word,
>
> a) Once "GlobalReserve" becomes to be not shown, it keep as is
> after tha, or
> b) Oneday "GlobalReserver" disappeared. Howevert it appear again
> at the next day or so.
>
In general, once it changes the first time, things don't seem to change
again afterwards.
>> although the behavior seems to be consistent for
>> a given filesystem.
>
> Did you confirm the following things for your Btrfs file system?
>
> a) btrfs scrub finishes without any problem, and
> b) dmesg doesn't show any suspicious message.
>
Scrub and dmesg both look fine, I've also run btrfsck in no-op mode and
that doesn't report any errors either.
>> I'm using btrfs-progs 3.17.1 and kernel 3.17.4
>> with grsecurity patches (although with much of the grsec stuff disabled)
>> on all such systems. I'd be happy to provide kernel .config or other
>> information for debugging on request.
>
> Could you tell me the following information, if possible?
>
> - mkfs options and mount options
In both cases that I currently have access to, I created the fs with:
mkfs.btrfs -O extref,skinny-metadata,no-holes -F <device-name>
and the mount option strings for the devices in question are:
noatime,space_cache,ssd,autodefrag
for /
and:
noatime,sync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,compress=zlib,ssd,space_cache,autodefrag for
/boot
> - The output of btrfs fi df
For /, I get:
Data, single: total=43.00GiB, used=40.76GiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=1.50GiB, used=1.05GiB
For /boot, I get:
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
> - .config
I've attached a gzipped copy.
> - Any possible trigger to cause this problem
There aren't any that I know of.
> - Btrfs specific operations, for example weekly btrfs scrub
I run scrub weekly, and balance and fstrim as needed.
> - Do you have any system which works fine and uses a kernel
> without grsecurity patches?
Yes, although said system has exclusively multi-device filesystems,
while the affected one is all single device filesystems.
>
> In addition, running one of your system with
>
> - upstream kernel without grsecurity, and
> - btrfs file system with which btrfs fi df works correctly,
>
I've got a recovery environment built using buildroot that is based on
the same kernel version without grsec patches, I'll reboot into that and
see what it says.
> can help to distinguish whether the problem comes from
> upstream kernel (of course it includes btrfs) or grsecurity.
> I'm not sure about grsecurity. however, I have encountered
> many problems caused by security modules.
I do have one other local kernel patch that I use, I've attached that as
well, although it should have no effect whatsoever on the fs code.
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 32360 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: change-vt-number.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 759 bytes --]
diff -rU3 linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h /usr/src/linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h
--- linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h 2014-10-01 14:20:45.855383160 -0400
+++ /usr/src/linux-3.16.3-gentoo/include/uapi/linux/vt.h 2014-08-03 18:25:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
* resizing).
*/
#define MIN_NR_CONSOLES 1 /* must be at least 1 */
-#define MAX_NR_CONSOLES 63 /* serial lines start at 64 */
-#define MAX_NR_USER_CONSOLES 63 /* must be root to allocate above this */
+#define MAX_NR_CONSOLES 15 /* serial lines start at 64 */
+#define MAX_NR_USER_CONSOLES 15 /* must be root to allocate above this */
/* Note: the ioctl VT_GETSTATE does not work for
consoles 16 and higher (since it returns a short) */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 14:31 Recent issues with btrfs fi df Austin S Hemmelgarn
[not found] ` <548161FE.3030301@jp.fujitsu.com>
2014-12-05 12:19 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2014-12-05 12:35 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5481A2D0.2050203@gmail.com \
--to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox