From: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
To: kreijack@inwind.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:17:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5485EB23.8040103@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5485E1A0.4030602@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/2014 12:36 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> I like this approach, but as I wrote before, it seems that
> initramfs executes a "btrfs dev scan".... (see my previoue email
> 'Re: PROBLEM: #89121 BTRFS mixes up mounted devices with their
> snapshots' date 2014/12/03 9:34):
>
> $ grep -r "btrfs dev.*scan" /usr/share/initramfs-tools/
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-premount/btrfs:
> /sbin/btrfs device scan 2> /dev/null
>
> (this is from a debian). However it has to be pointed out that
> fedora doesn't seems to do the same...
Need to fix that initramfs script then. On the other hand, if one
*does* run a scan with no arguments, then it probably is a good idea
to ignore snapshots.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUhesjAAoJENRVrw2cjl5RPRAIALK5ERJqRJLSsa6kBSIP8bWe
WP531ew49I0Tkc0o3YOCqq07tb4kZ5rsLsPaLE+s3adCe5/wYzQOox4x6ucak1gK
0igazFx9TYM65YRtFzIUAnj/CPN4WwIInwoAac4w2qwCKB56WUbSU60lEsOmFfRr
6m9EUYkBtMRiWfW2jjuj8iLnBW6glexAqTpW1eKWPfF0AGoUXc8AQboNwceFnHi3
vcjmQM6mhL5zH+FJ0Z/meTk/PwVdjEVJQIEcbMpvggAJeqxsm90GHVIsn8C7B80i
GcX8GHe+Gw3WJMsaW49slKa+MOjWt2SumN/lrKFYPVwQUguhvg0hC1UG5m3cJFo=
=64dH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 18:39 [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] Avoid to consider lvm snapshots when scanning devices Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 2:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-08 14:58 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-09 0:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-09 10:27 ` David Sterba
2014-12-09 18:19 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] 'btrfs device scan' skips lvm snapshots Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] Update 'btrfs device scan' man page Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] Add reference to BTRFS_SKIP_LVM_SNAPSHOT environment variable Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] Abort in case of device uuid conflict Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-05 7:26 ` [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Don't use LVM snapshot device Duncan
2014-12-05 18:39 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 15:30 ` Phillip Susi
2014-12-08 17:36 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-12-08 18:17 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2014-12-08 19:22 ` Robert White
2014-12-10 7:52 ` Anand Jain
2014-12-10 18:40 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5485EB23.8040103@ubuntu.com \
--to=psusi@ubuntu.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox