From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Florian Uekermann <florian@uekermann.me>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Device only missing if unmounted
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:46:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5487B3FB.4070109@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <708100218.650154.1418123709778.JavaMail.open-xchange@omgreatgod.store>
On 09/12/2014 19:15, Florian Uekermann wrote:
> I am using a few disks in Raid1 mode. This is the output of various
> commands in unmounted state.
>
> root@oot:/# uname -a
> Linux oot 3.18.0-rc5+ #1 SMP Sun Nov 23 18:01:56 CET 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> root@oot:/# btrfs --version
> Btrfs v3.17
> root@oot:/# btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: be2b3499-7452-4b91-b664-4ec4d7ff62b9
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 149.68GiB
> devid 2 size 465.76GiB used 151.03GiB path /dev/sdb
> devid 3 size 465.76GiB used 151.03GiB path /dev/sda
> devid 4 size 92.26GiB used 0.00B path /dev/sdc4
>
> Btrfs v3.17
> root@oot:/# btrfs fi df /srv/storage/
> Data, RAID1: total=150.00GiB, used=149.40GiB
> System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
> Metadata, RAID1: total=1.00GiB, used=287.42MiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=96.00MiB, used=0.00B
>
> I stripped a few lines from the output of btrfs fi show, which
> describe other filesystems.
> If I unmount the devices in question, I get the following
> output (note that missing devices are reported now):
>
> root@oot:/# btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: be2b3499-7452-4b91-b664-4ec4d7ff62b9
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 149.68GiB
> devid 2 size 465.76GiB used 151.03GiB path /dev/sdb
> devid 3 size 465.76GiB used 151.03GiB path /dev/sda
> devid 4 size 92.26GiB used 0.00B path /dev/sdc4
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Btrfs v3.17
>
> I got into this state by removing a device from the array formatting it
> and then adding it again (some time ago, I can't remember the exact
> sequence of commands)
above you mention both btrfs fi show outputs in unmounted only.
It depends on the disk that is read first, you could read super block
using btrfs-show-super and check if num_device.
> The discrepancy in output between mounted and unmounted state is not
> a problem in itself for me, but this issue seems to interrupt systemds
> boot sequence, which only continues successfully if I mount the array manually.
> The array is not degraded, I just removed a drive (via btrfs delete I think).
It may fail if you are mounting more than one subvol during boot and if
you don't have this patch.
commit 0f23ae74f589304bf33233f85737f4fd368549eb
Author: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Date: Thu Sep 18 07:49:05 2014 -0700
Revert "Btrfs: device_list_add() should not update list when mounted"
This reverts commit b96de000bc8bc9688b3a2abea4332bd57648a49f.
> If I try to remove the "missing devices" with the btrfs tool the following
> happens:
>
> btrfs dev del missing /srv/storage
> ERROR: error removing the device 'missing' - no missing devices found to remove
that means you don't see missing when mounted. if you don't see
missing when mounted then no need to run delete missing. ?
> btrfs balance start /srv/storage/ does not solve the issue.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 11:15 Device only missing if unmounted Florian Uekermann
2014-12-10 2:46 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2014-12-13 14:24 ` Florian Uekermann
2014-12-18 0:56 ` Anand Jain
[not found] ` <1184043001.122994.1419096721838.JavaMail.open-xchange@ptangptang.store>
2014-12-24 15:45 ` Anand Jain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-11 15:49 Florian Uekermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5487B3FB.4070109@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=florian@uekermann.me \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).