From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-18-i2.italiaonline.it ([212.48.25.198]:59930 "EHLO smtp-18.italiaonline.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932527AbaLJTE3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:04:29 -0500 Message-ID: <54889988.2080502@inwind.it> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:05:44 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dongsheng Yang , Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> CC: linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: get more accurate output in fd command. References: <1418124037-8210-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <548743CE.1020403@inwind.it> <54879CFE.1090909@cn.fujitsu.com> <54882634.4000809@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/10/2014 04:02 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: >> Robert White posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:53:40 -0800 as excerpted: [...] >> And in the example, the mkfs was supplied with two devices, so there's no >> dup metadata remaining from a formerly single-device filesystem, either. >> (Tho there will be the small single-mode stubs, empty, remaining from the >> mkfs process, as no balance has been run to delete them yet, but those >> are much smaller and empty.) > > Yes. One question not related here: how about delete them in the end of mkfs? > > Thanx A btrfs balance should remove them. If you don't want to balance a full filesystem, you can filter the chunk by usage (set a low usage). Recently it was discussed in a tread... BR Goffredo -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5