From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.169]:43250 "EHLO
	resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbaLPDwR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:52:17 -0500
Message-ID: <548FAC6F.1010704@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:52:15 -0800
From: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Grzegorz Kowal <custos.mentis@gmail.com>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Standards Problems [Was: [PATCH v2 1/3] Btrfs: get more accurate
 output in df command.]
References: <36be817396956bffe981a69ea0b8796c44153fa5.1418203063.git.yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>	<548B4117.1040007@inwind.it>	<CA+qeAOokzptsxMKJaQwtVSFe5UxYuZnx5E22iMjRqM4AsuN8bA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABmMA7tw9BDsBXGHLO4vjcO4gaYmZPb_BQV8w22griqFvCJpPA@mail.gmail.com> <CABmMA7vtHzUYAhnEfpnx3Fx93SJyx=Qqoaz-PyQcivo=51jKsA@mail.gmail.com> <548E377D.6030804@cn.fujitsu.com> <548E7A7A.90505@pobox.com> <548E929B.2090203@pobox.com> <548E9B38.9080202@cn.fujitsu.com> <548EABBB.4060204@pobox.com> <548FA762.2070504@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <548FA762.2070504@pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/15/2014 07:30 PM, Robert White wrote:
> The above would be ideal. But POSIX says "no". f_blocks is defined (only
Correction the linux kernel says "total data blocks", POSIX says "total 
blocks" -- it was a mental typo... 8-)
> in the comments) as "total data blocks in the filesystem" and /bin/df
> pivots on that assumption, so the only usable option left is ::