* Fwd: Re: [RFC][BTRFS-PROGS] Improve output of mkfs.btrfs command
[not found] <5491D215.4060109@inwind.it>
@ 2014-12-17 19:14 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Goffredo Baroncelli @ 2014-12-17 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
I forgoto to put in CC the mailing list
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [RFC][BTRFS-PROGS] Improve output of mkfs.btrfs command
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:57:25 +0100
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it
To: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
On 12/17/2014 04:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:02:53 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>
>> enclosed a patches set to improve the output of mkfs.btrfs command.
>
> This is very nice! I do have a comment about the device list:
>
>> ..
>> UUID ID SIZE PATH
>> ------------------------------------ -- --------- -----------
>> 62121322-5666-4ecf-bc8e-c9b3d9f60db9 1 50.00GiB /dev/vdb
>> 6158cb13-3ae8-42b6-8603-660f1e5c8a7a 2 50.00GiB /dev/vdc
>> b49516db-ddf5-4f54-8831-a4babc79e901 3 50.00GiB /dev/vdd
>> 00b03d81-7d29-4894-8050-9dd205f97c41 4 50.00GiB /dev/vde
>> f119a2ec-5ef0-436c-805e-c1b0612b05ca 5 50.00GiB /dev/vdf
>> adee4f58-e094-4bd4-8c56-941527524f8d 6 50.00GiB /dev/vdg
>> a8299171-2024-4057-ba56-1f83bf6d7e2e 7 50.00GiB /dev/vdh
>> b694e275-e454-4dbd-beb0-e33c388cffa2 8 2.00GiB /dev/vdi
>> 7cbe04b5-36cd-4ea7-be82-206d5487914e 9 2.00GiB /dev/vdj
>> 7c320654-675e-456b-ac23-cfb148b8ea57 10 2.00GiB /dev/vdk
>>
>> Total disks size: 356.01GiB
>
> I'm not sure how others feel about this, but the first column of UUIDs
> contains almost no human-usable information (who remembers UUIDs?) but
> takes up a huge chunk of the screen real estate. I'd suggest to reorder
> the columns to be something like (ID, Size, Path, UUID). This puts more
> relevant information in reading-order.
UUIDs have a fixed size, SIZE is up to 10 chars,
ID length should be less equal than 3 (up to 999 devices !); only path
has a variable length (think about LVM devices....). This is the reason to
put path at the end. Is the same logic that put the filename on the right
when doing ls -l...
I would like more feedback about that. I am open to swap the fields, but the
"Total disks size" should be below the SIZE column"
>
> I hope this isn't too much to ask :)
>
> thanks
> Holger
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-12-17 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5491D215.4060109@inwind.it>
2014-12-17 19:14 ` Fwd: Re: [RFC][BTRFS-PROGS] Improve output of mkfs.btrfs command Goffredo Baroncelli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).