From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs-prog: improve build-system by autoconf
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:00:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5493163C.6030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141218133111.GG19904@x2.net.home>
On 12/18/14 7:31 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:07:26PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>>> This is first step to make btrfs-progs build system more conventional
>>> for userspace users and developers. All is implemented by small incremental
>>> patches to keep things review-able.
>>
>> Thanks. I went through the patches and haven't found major problems. The
>> changes are affecting build system and this will need a longer period
>> before all distros have a chance to adapt to that, so I'm postponing it
>> to 3.19.
>
> Cool, I'll try to prepare next set of patches with automake.
>
> BTW, I have good experience with build-system changes -- downstream
> distributions (maintainers) are usually pretty flexible :-)
>
>>> Note that there is also strange unused btrfs_convert_libs, btrfs_image_libs and
>>> btrfs_fragments_libs variables with things like "-lgd -lpng -ljpeg -lfreetype".
>>> I guess it's some legacy, right? I didn't touch these variables as I have no
>>> clue about sense of this stuff.
>>
>> No, it's part of the macro magic. There are pattern rules that accept
>> any source in the form btrfs-something.c and also pick the libraries for
>> that from variable btrfs_something_libs:
>>
>> btrfs-%: $(objects) $(libs) btrfs-%.o
>> @echo " [LD] $@"
>> $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $(objects) $@.o $(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS) $($(subst -,_,$@-libs))
>>
>> This is for convenience, if this turns out to be hard to do with in combination
>> with autotools, I don't insist on keeping it but it has simplified the Makefile
>> significantly.
Yeah, I did those long ago IIRC. It obfuscates things a bit, but cut down on tons of
cut and paste in the Makefile...
> OK, so -ljpeg in the Makefile is just example, right?
It's been specified for the btrfs-framgnets tool since .. forever.
commit 6d37fbfc1f83c34f00df7c9d8e5b60e49d9db48d
Author: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Date: Mon Nov 28 17:12:30 2011 +0100
Btrfs-progs: tool to visualize fragmentation
...
+btrfs-fragments: $(objects) $(libs) fragments.o
+ @echo " [LD] $@"
+ $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o btrfs-fragments $(objects) fragments.o $(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS) -lgd -lpng -ljpeg -lfreetype
but the code only does:
gdImagePng(im, pngout);
so it's probably not needed...
>
> Anyway, for these things is better to introduce extra autoconf
> AC_ARG_VAR() variables, keep is empty by default and use it in
> Makefile. The advantage is that the variables are documented and
> visible by ./configure --help.
>
> For example in util-linux we have many {SUID,DAEMON,SOLIB,...}_CFLAGS
> and LDFLAGS for distributions that require extensions like -fPIE,
> -Wl,-z,relro etc. The same is possible to do with $LIBS.
Once auto$FOO is implemented, I am sure there are better ways to do it
than what I did. :)
Thanks,
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-18 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 12:35 btrfs-prog: improve build-system by autoconf Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs-progs: add ./configure script Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs-progs: use config.h Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs-progs: use standard PACKAGE_* macros Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs-progs: use ./configure to generate version.h Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs-progs: check for build programs in ./configure Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs-progs: use paths and $*_LIBS from ./configure Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs-progs: cleanup compilation flags usage Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs-progs: clean generated files, make version.h stuff more robust Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs-progs: add --disable-backtrace Karel Zak
2014-12-12 12:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs-progs: add --disable-documentation Karel Zak
2014-12-17 14:07 ` btrfs-prog: improve build-system by autoconf David Sterba
2014-12-18 13:31 ` Karel Zak
2014-12-18 18:00 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-12-22 12:47 ` Koen Kooi
2015-01-16 15:26 ` Karel Zak
2015-01-28 15:38 ` David Sterba
2015-02-04 11:40 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5493163C.6030604@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).