From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.160]:55105 "EHLO resqmta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751114AbaLWALz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:11:55 -0500 Message-ID: <5498B349.4030106@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:11:53 -0800 From: Robert White MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Sharpe CC: ronnie sahlberg , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Chris Murphy , Btrfs BTRFS Subject: Re: Can BTRFS handle XATTRs larger than 4K? References: <54982A79.1090102@gmail.com> <54985E4C.40003@gmail.com> <5498829E.3060608@gmail.com> <5498A0BD.3000300@pobox.com> <5498AF7B.2020002@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/22/2014 03:58 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Robert White wrote: >> So I'll ask again... >> >> On 12/22/2014 03:15 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Robert White wrote: >>>> >>>> So skipping the full ADS, what's the current demand/payoff for large >>>> XATTR >>>> space? >> >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> So skipping the full ADS, what is the current demand/payoff for large XATTR >> space? > > As I said, NTFS Security Descriptors (sometimes incorrectly called > ACLs) as set by Samba. > yep, other branch of thread, my re-ask was towards Ronie Sahlberg as quoted... we passed each other on the backstretch... 8-)