linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: get the accurate value of used_bytes in btrfs_get_block_group_info().
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:27:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54ACEDEC.7090904@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AA732B.7010301@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi Dongsheng,

On 2015/01/05 20:19, Dongsheng Yang wrote:

> Ping.....
>
> IOCTL of BTRFS_IOC_SPACE_INFO currently does not report
> the data used but not synced to user.  Then btrfs fi df will
> give user a wrong numbers before sync. This patch solve
> this problem.
>
> On 10/27/2014 08:38 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> Reproducer:
>>     # mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G /dev/sdb
>>     # mount /dev/sdb /mnt/test
>>     # fallocate  -l 17G /mnt/test/largefile
>>     # btrfs fi df /mnt/test
>>     Data, single: total=17.49GiB, used=6.00GiB <- only 6G, but actually it should be 17G.
>>     System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>>     System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>     Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>>     Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>     GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B

I tried to reproduce your problem with 3.19-rc1.
However, this problem doesn't happen. Could you
also try to reproduce with the upstream kernel?

* Detail

test script (named "yang-test.sh" here):
===============================================================================
#!/bin/bash -x

PART1=/dev/vdb
MNT_PNT=./mnt
mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G ${PART1}
mount ${PART1} ${MNT_PNT}
fallocate -l 17G ${MNT_PNT}/largefile
btrfs fi df ${MNT_PNT}
sync
btrfs fi df ${MNT_PNT}
umount ${MNT_PNT}
===============================================================================

Result:
===============================================================================
# ./yang-test.sh
+ PART1=/dev/vdb
+ MNT_PNT=./mnt
+ mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G /dev/vdb
Btrfs v3.17
See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.

Turning ON incompat feature 'extref': increased hardlink limit per file to 65536
fs created label (null) on /dev/vdb
         nodesize 16384 leafsize 16384 sectorsize 4096 size 20.00GiB
+ mount /dev/vdb ./mnt
+ fallocate -l 17G ./mnt/largefile
+ btrfs fi df ./mnt
Data, single: total=17.01GiB, used=17.00GiB   # Used 17GiB properly
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
+ sync
+ btrfs fi df ./mnt
Data, single: total=17.01GiB, used=17.00GiB    # (of course) used 17GiB too
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
+ umount ./mnt
===============================================================================

Although I ran this test five times, the results are the same.

Thanks,
Satoru

>>     # sync
>>     # btrfs fi df /mnt/test
>>     Data, single: total=17.49GiB, used=17.00GiB <- After sync, it is expected.
>>     System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>>     System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>     Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>>     Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>     GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>
>> The value of 6.00GiB is actually calculated in btrfs_get_block_group_info()
>> by adding the @block_group->item->used for each group together. In this way,
>> it did not consider the bytes in cache.
>>
>> This patch adds the value of @pinned, @reserved and @bytes_super in
>> struct btrfs_block_group_cache to make sure we can get the accurate @used_bytes.
>>
>> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 33c80f5..bc2aaeb 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -3892,6 +3892,10 @@ void btrfs_get_block_group_info(struct list_head *groups_list,
>>           space->total_bytes += block_group->key.offset;
>>           space->used_bytes +=
>>               btrfs_block_group_used(&block_group->item);
>> +        /* Add bytes-info in cache */
>> +        space->used_bytes += block_group->pinned;
>> +        space->used_bytes += block_group->reserved;
>> +        space->used_bytes += block_group->bytes_super;
>>       }
>>   }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-27 12:38 [PATCH] btrfs: get the accurate value of used_bytes in btrfs_get_block_group_info() Dongsheng Yang
2015-01-05 11:19 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-01-07  8:27   ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2015-01-07  9:22     ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-07  9:41       ` Dongsheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54ACEDEC.7090904@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).