From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>,
<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: get the accurate value of used_bytes in btrfs_get_block_group_info().
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:41:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54ACFF48.4000201@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54ACFAF2.2010700@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 01/07/2015 05:22 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Satoru-san
>> Hi Dongsheng,
>>
>> On 2015/01/05 20:19, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>>
>>> Ping.....
>>>
>>> IOCTL of BTRFS_IOC_SPACE_INFO currently does not report
>>> the data used but not synced to user. Then btrfs fi df will
>>> give user a wrong numbers before sync. This patch solve
>>> this problem.
>>>
>>> On 10/27/2014 08:38 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>>>> Reproducer:
>>>> # mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G /dev/sdb
>>>> # mount /dev/sdb /mnt/test
>>>> # fallocate -l 17G /mnt/test/largefile
>>>> # btrfs fi df /mnt/test
>>>> Data, single: total=17.49GiB, used=6.00GiB <- only 6G, but
>>>> actually it should be 17G.
>>>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>>>> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>> Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>>>> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>> GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>
>> I tried to reproduce your problem with 3.19-rc1.
>> However, this problem doesn't happen. Could you
>> also try to reproduce with the upstream kernel?
> I can still reproduce it in 3.18, but it seems to be fixed in 3.19-rc1
> already by other patch,
> so this patch is no longer needed.
Oops, my fault. I forgot to test it with upstream. :(
Satoru and Qu, thanx a lot.
Yang
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>>
>> * Detail
>>
>> test script (named "yang-test.sh" here):
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> #!/bin/bash -x
>>
>> PART1=/dev/vdb
>> MNT_PNT=./mnt
>> mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G ${PART1}
>> mount ${PART1} ${MNT_PNT}
>> fallocate -l 17G ${MNT_PNT}/largefile
>> btrfs fi df ${MNT_PNT}
>> sync
>> btrfs fi df ${MNT_PNT}
>> umount ${MNT_PNT}
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>>
>> Result:
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> # ./yang-test.sh
>> + PART1=/dev/vdb
>> + MNT_PNT=./mnt
>> + mkfs.btrfs -f -b 20G /dev/vdb
>> Btrfs v3.17
>> See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
>>
>> Turning ON incompat feature 'extref': increased hardlink limit per
>> file to 65536
>> fs created label (null) on /dev/vdb
>> nodesize 16384 leafsize 16384 sectorsize 4096 size 20.00GiB
>> + mount /dev/vdb ./mnt
>> + fallocate -l 17G ./mnt/largefile
>> + btrfs fi df ./mnt
>> Data, single: total=17.01GiB, used=17.00GiB # Used 17GiB properly
>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> + sync
>> + btrfs fi df ./mnt
>> Data, single: total=17.01GiB, used=17.00GiB # (of course) used
>> 17GiB too
>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
>> + umount ./mnt
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>>
>> Although I ran this test five times, the results are the same.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Satoru
>>
>>>> # sync
>>>> # btrfs fi df /mnt/test
>>>> Data, single: total=17.49GiB, used=17.00GiB <- After sync, it
>>>> is expected.
>>>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
>>>> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>> Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=112.00KiB
>>>> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>> GlobalReserve, single: total=16.00MiB, used=0.00B
>>>>
>>>> The value of 6.00GiB is actually calculated in
>>>> btrfs_get_block_group_info()
>>>> by adding the @block_group->item->used for each group together. In
>>>> this way,
>>>> it did not consider the bytes in cache.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds the value of @pinned, @reserved and @bytes_super in
>>>> struct btrfs_block_group_cache to make sure we can get the accurate
>>>> @used_bytes.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> index 33c80f5..bc2aaeb 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> @@ -3892,6 +3892,10 @@ void btrfs_get_block_group_info(struct
>>>> list_head *groups_list,
>>>> space->total_bytes += block_group->key.offset;
>>>> space->used_bytes +=
>>>> btrfs_block_group_used(&block_group->item);
>>>> + /* Add bytes-info in cache */
>>>> + space->used_bytes += block_group->pinned;
>>>> + space->used_bytes += block_group->reserved;
>>>> + space->used_bytes += block_group->bytes_super;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-btrfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 12:38 [PATCH] btrfs: get the accurate value of used_bytes in btrfs_get_block_group_info() Dongsheng Yang
2015-01-05 11:19 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-01-07 8:27 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2015-01-07 9:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-07 9:41 ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54ACFF48.4000201@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).