From: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:50:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AF41E9.2000609@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109020650.GA3565386@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com>
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:06:50 -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 09:01:57AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:23:13 -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
>>> Below test will fail currently:
>>> mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda
>>> btrfs-convert /dev/sda
>>> mount /dev/sda /mnt
>>> btrfs device add -f /dev/sdb /mnt
>>> btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
>>>
>>> The reason is there are some block groups with usage 0, but the whole
>>> disk hasn't free space to allocate new chunk, so we even can't set such
>>> block group readonly. This patch deletes the chunk allocation when
>>> setting block group ro. For META, we already have reserve. But for
>>> SYSTEM, we don't have, so the check_system_chunk is still required.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>>> index a80b971..430101b6 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>>> @@ -8493,22 +8493,8 @@ static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
>>> {
>>> struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
>>> u64 num_bytes;
>>> - u64 min_allocable_bytes;
>>> int ret = -ENOSPC;
>>>
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * We need some metadata space and system metadata space for
>>> - * allocating chunks in some corner cases until we force to set
>>> - * it to be readonly.
>>> - */
>>> - if ((sinfo->flags &
>>> - (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)) &&
>>> - !force)
>>> - min_allocable_bytes = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
>>> - else
>>> - min_allocable_bytes = 0;
>>> -
>>> spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
>>> spin_lock(&cache->lock);
>>>
[SNIP]
>>> ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
>>> if (!ret)
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -8566,6 +8544,11 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
>>> goto out;
>>> ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
>>> out:
>>> + if (cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) {
>>> + alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(root, cache->flags);
>>> + check_system_chunk(trans, root, alloc_flags);
>>
>> Please consider the case that the following patch fixed
>> 199c36eaa95077a47ae1bc55532fc0fbeb80cc95
>>
>> If there is no free device space, check_system_chunk can not allocate
>> new system metadata chunk, so when we run final step of the chunk
>> allocation to update the device item and insert the new chunk item, we
>> would fail.
>
> So the relocation will always fail in this case. The check just makes
> the failure earlier, right? We don't have the BUG_ON in
> do_chunk_alloc() currently.
The final step of the chunk allocation is a delayed operation, we must make sure
it can be done successfully, or we would abort the transaction, make the
filesystem readonly and lose the data that is written into the filesystem before
we do balance, it would make the users unconfortable.
With this patch, we will set the block group successfully at the first time we
invoke set_block_group_ro(). But if the block group that will be set to RO is
the only system metadata block group in the filesystem, and there is no device
space to allocate a new one, that is we have no space to deal with the pending
final step of chunk allocation, so the problem I said above will happen.
Thanks
Miao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 21:23 [PATCH] btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro Shaohua Li
2015-01-09 1:01 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-09 2:06 ` Shaohua Li
2015-01-09 2:50 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2015-01-09 18:40 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AF41E9.2000609@huawei.com \
--to=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).