From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <dsterba@suse.cz>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs-progs: Add support to suppress tree block csum error output.
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:58:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C985B1.2010300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150128181641.GH3641@twin.jikos.cz>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs-progs: Add support to suppress tree
block csum error output.
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2015年01月29日 02:16
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:45:04PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Add new open ctree flag OPEN_CTREE_SUPPRESS_ERROR to suppress tree block
>> csum error output.
>>
>> @@ -996,6 +996,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
>> unsigned int on_restoring:1;
>> unsigned int is_chunk_recover:1;
>> unsigned int quota_enabled:1;
>> + unsigned int suppress_error:1;
> This is confusing, it suppresses only csum errors.
Indeed, what about suprress_csum_err?
>
>> --- a/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/disk-io.c
>> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ static int check_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *buf)
>> struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
>> int ret = 1;
>>
>> - if (buf->start != btrfs_header_bytenr(buf)) {
>> + if (buf->start != btrfs_header_bytenr(buf) &&
>> + !root->fs_info->suppress_error) {
> Though here it's used to skip block start mismatch error. But looking at
> the rest of the code, it's better to put this check to the caller and
> keep check_tree_block as is.
Did you mean move the bytenr check out of check_tree_block() and caller
do the bytenr check?
If so, I'll change it soon.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>> printk("Check tree block failed, want=%Lu, have=%Lu\n",
>> buf->start, btrfs_header_bytenr(buf));
>> return ret;
>> @@ -118,6 +119,8 @@ int csum_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *buf,
>> {
>> u16 csum_size =
>> btrfs_super_csum_size(root->fs_info->super_copy);
>> + if (verify && root->fs_info->suppress_error)
>> + return verify_tree_block_csum_silent(buf, csum_size);
>> return csum_tree_block_size(buf, csum_size, verify);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -282,10 +285,13 @@ struct extent_buffer *read_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
>> return eb;
>> }
>> if (ignore) {
>> - if (check_tree_block(root, eb))
>> - printk("read block failed check_tree_block\n");
>> - else
>> - printk("Csum didn't match\n");
>> + if (check_tree_block(root, eb)) {
>> + if (!root->fs_info->suppress_error)
>> + printk("read block failed check_tree_block\n");
>> + } else {
>> + if (!root->fs_info->suppress_error)
>> + printk("Csum didn't match\n");
>> + }
>> break;
>> }
>> num_copies = btrfs_num_copies(&root->fs_info->mapping_tree,
>> @@ -1112,6 +1118,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
>> }
>> if (flags & OPEN_CTREE_RESTORE)
>> fs_info->on_restoring = 1;
>> + if (flags & OPEN_CTREE_SUPPRESS_ERROR)
>> + fs_info->suppress_error = 1;
>>
>> ret = btrfs_scan_fs_devices(fp, path, &fs_devices, sb_bytenr,
>> (flags & OPEN_CTREE_RECOVER_SUPER));
>> diff --git a/disk-io.h b/disk-io.h
>> index e12870e..90ede6b 100644
>> --- a/disk-io.h
>> +++ b/disk-io.h
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum btrfs_open_ctree_flags {
>> OPEN_CTREE_RESTORE = (1 << 4),
>> OPEN_CTREE_NO_BLOCK_GROUPS = (1 << 5),
>> OPEN_CTREE_EXCLUSIVE = (1 << 6),
>> + OPEN_CTREE_SUPPRESS_ERROR = (1 << 7), /* Suppress csum error */
>> };
>>
>> static inline u64 btrfs_sb_offset(int mirror)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-29 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 6:45 [PATCH v2 00/10] Enhance btrfs-find-root and open_ctree() to provide better chance on damaged btrfs Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] btrfs-progs: Cleanup, use bitshift instead of immediate number in btrfs_open_ctree_flags Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs-progs: Add support to suppress tree block csum error output Qu Wenruo
2015-01-28 18:16 ` David Sterba
2015-01-29 0:58 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] btrfs-progs: Add new btrfs_open_ctree_flags CHUNK_ONLY Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] btrfs-progs: Add new find-root.[ch] infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] btrfs-progs: Switch btrfs-find-root to use the new open_ctree flags Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] btrfs-progs: Add better search generation judgment for btrfs-find-root Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] btrfs-progs: Swith btrfs-find-root to use the find-root infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] btrfs-progs: Cleanup unneeded btrfs-find-root codes Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] btrfs-progs: Add new option for btrfs-find-root to search through all the metadata extents Qu Wenruo
2015-01-19 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] btrfs-progs: Allow open_ctree use backup tree root or search it automatically if primary tree root is corrupted Qu Wenruo
2015-07-27 15:04 ` David Sterba
2015-07-28 0:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-07-28 12:00 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C985B1.2010300@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).