From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Christian Robottom Reis <kiko@canonical.com>,
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Quota limit question
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:41:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FEAE48.5020309@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150306214430.GC16722@async.com.br>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Quota limit question
From: Christian Robottom Reis <kiko@canonical.com>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date: 2015年03月07日 05:44
> Just as a follow-up, I upgraded btrfs-tools and the kernel again. I
> currently have a filesystem which reports 1G exclusive use:
>
> root@riff# btrfs qg show -r -e /var -p -c
> qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child
> -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ -----
> 0/261 1.52GiB 1.01GiB 0.00B 100.00GiB --- ---
It's recommended to sync the btrfs before 'qg show' command, since quota
tree is not updated until commit transaction.
>
> This filesystem reports over quota, and removing the quota fixes that:
>
> root@riff# touch x
> touch: cannot touch ‘x’: Disk quota exceeded
> root@riff# btrfs qg limit -e
> none 261 /var
> root@riff# touch x
> root@riff#
>
> So at the moment quotas are pretty much unusable in kernel 3.18.6/tools
> 3.18.2, at least for my use case, and that's a bit surprising since
> there isn't anything very interesting about it (other than it contains a
> bunch of lxc-cloned rootfs).
Yes, Btrfs really has some problems, from yours to other annoying
incorrect values.
[Some guess]
For your case, I'm afraid your reserved space in your qgroup takes too
much space, and it's definitely a bug. Maybe some btrfs_qgroup_reserve()
leaking?
[Reproducer]
Would you please describe your workload? Or some easy-to-reproduce scripts?
[Image dump/debug tree]
Another one which may help is your btrfs-debug-tree output on your quota
tree.
You can dump it by "btrfs-debug-tree -t 8 <DEVICE>".
Or full disk metadata dump by "btrfs-image -c9 <DEVICE>"
Thanks,
Qu
>
> I've proactively added Yang who has submitted a few patches on quota
> checking recently just to let me know if he thinks that this should be
> fixed with a trunk kernel, or if he'd like to investigate or consider
> this further. Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 03:52:41AM +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> Christian Robottom Reis posted on Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:36:02 -0200 as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:15:37PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>>>> # btrfs qgroup limit 2000m 0/261 . && touch x touch: cannot touch
>>>> ‘x’: Disk quota exceeded
>>>>
>>>> The strange thing is that it doesn't seem to be actually out of space:
>>>>
>>>> # btrfs qgroup show -p -r -e /var | grep 261
>>>> 0/261 1111810048 391114752 2097152000 0 ---
>>>
>>> Replying to myself as I had not yet been subscribed in time to receive a
>>> reply; I just upgraded to 3.18.1 and am seeing the same issue on the
>>> same subvolume (and on no others).
>>
>> Looking at the thread here on gmane.org (list2news and list2web gateway),
>> it appears my reply was the only reply in any case, and it was general as
>> I don't run quotas myself.
>>
>> Basically I suggested upgrading, as the quota code as some rather huge
>> bugs in it (quotas could go seriously negative!) with the old versions
>> you were running. But you've upgraded at least the kernel now (userspace
>> you didn't say).
>>
>> Here's a link to the thread on the gmane web interface for completeness,
>> but the above about covers my reply, as I said the only one until your
>> thread bump and my reply here, so there's not much new there unless
>> someone posts further followups to this thread...
>>
>>
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/41491
>>
>>
>> --
>> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
>> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
>> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 1:15 Quota limit question Christian Robottom Reis
2014-12-17 11:13 ` Duncan
2014-12-23 20:36 ` Christian Robottom Reis
2014-12-24 3:52 ` Duncan
2015-03-06 21:44 ` Christian Robottom Reis
2015-03-10 8:41 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-03-10 11:03 ` Dongsheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FEAE48.5020309@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=kiko@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).