From: Torbjørn <lists@skagestad.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: fdmanana@gmail.com, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:18:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551AF2FF.6020708@skagestad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427825525.24929.0@mail.thefacebook.com>
On 03/31/2015 08:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Torbjørn <lists@skagestad.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a follow up on this report.
>>
>> The file system in question is a raid1 across 2x320G old Western
>> Digital WD3200KS.
>> I janked them out of the server to run a fsck on another computer
>> (after a proper shutdown).
>>
>> One of the disks did not get properly detected on the secondary
>> computer.
>> Hopefully the fsck of the single disk is still of some value to you.
>>
>> As you can see, there are several issues with the fs.
>> The system has occasionally had hard reboots.
>>
>> The fs does not have any real value for me. Everything worth anything
>> is backed up.
>> I'll keep the drive around in case it's of any value for some devs.
>>
>> As noted before: this (corrupted) fs only get errors when booting
>> into 4.0-rc5. With 4.0-rc4 or earlier it works as if nothing is wrong.
>
> This is really strange because we also have reports from v3.19 stable
> kernels, but none of the btrfs patches between rc4 and rc5 were tagged
> for stable.
>
> Can I convince you to hammer a bit more on rc4? I'd like to make sure
> it really was a regression introdcued in rc5.
>
> -chris
>
>
>
>
Perhaps I was a bit unclear. The error is triggered when booting into
rc5. If I reset and try to start up rc4 or earlier, it is still there.
After zero-log I can boot into rc4.
I already did a fresh reinstall to alternative drives. I did not want to
have the corrupted fs as root.
I'm not sure I can get the second disk in the raid1 to work. It was head
crashing when trying to attach it for fsck. If I somehow get it back
online I can do some more testing. Anything in particular?
--
Torbjørn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 10:35 Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists Torbjørn
2015-03-23 12:32 ` Chris Mason
2015-03-23 12:52 ` Torbjørn Skagestad
2015-03-23 12:36 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-03-23 12:53 ` Torbjørn Skagestad
2015-03-23 13:47 ` Chris Mason
2015-03-23 13:50 ` Torbjørn
2015-03-23 15:29 ` Torbjørn
2015-03-30 17:42 ` Torbjørn
2015-03-31 18:12 ` Chris Mason
2015-03-31 19:18 ` Torbjørn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551AF2FF.6020708@skagestad.org \
--to=lists@skagestad.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).