linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torbjørn <lists@skagestad.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: fdmanana@gmail.com, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:18:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <551AF2FF.6020708@skagestad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427825525.24929.0@mail.thefacebook.com>

On 03/31/2015 08:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Torbjørn <lists@skagestad.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a follow up on this report.
>>
>> The file system in question is a raid1 across 2x320G old Western 
>> Digital WD3200KS.
>> I janked them out of the server to run a fsck on another computer 
>> (after a proper shutdown).
>>
>> One of the disks did not get properly detected on the secondary 
>> computer.
>> Hopefully the fsck of the single disk is still of some value to you.
>>
>> As you can see, there are several issues with the fs.
>> The system has occasionally had hard reboots.
>>
>> The fs does not have any real value for me. Everything worth anything 
>> is backed up.
>> I'll keep the drive around in case it's of any value for some devs.
>>
>> As noted before: this (corrupted) fs only get errors when booting 
>> into 4.0-rc5. With 4.0-rc4 or earlier it works as if nothing is wrong.
>
> This is really strange because we also have reports from v3.19 stable 
> kernels, but none of the btrfs patches between rc4 and rc5 were tagged 
> for stable.
>
> Can I convince you to hammer a bit more on rc4?  I'd like to make sure 
> it really was a regression introdcued in rc5.
>
> -chris
>
>
>
>
Perhaps I was a bit unclear. The error is triggered when booting into 
rc5. If I reset and try to start up rc4 or earlier, it is still there. 
After zero-log I can boot into rc4.

I already did a fresh reinstall to alternative drives. I did not want to 
have the corrupted fs as root.

I'm not sure I can get the second disk in the raid1 to work. It was head 
crashing when trying to attach it for fsck. If I somehow get it back 
online I can do some more testing. Anything in particular?

--
Torbjørn

      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-31 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-23 10:35 Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists Torbjørn
2015-03-23 12:32 ` Chris Mason
2015-03-23 12:52   ` Torbjørn Skagestad
2015-03-23 12:36 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-03-23 12:53   ` Torbjørn Skagestad
2015-03-23 13:47     ` Chris Mason
2015-03-23 13:50       ` Torbjørn
2015-03-23 15:29         ` Torbjørn
2015-03-30 17:42           ` Torbjørn
2015-03-31 18:12             ` Chris Mason
2015-03-31 19:18               ` Torbjørn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=551AF2FF.6020708@skagestad.org \
    --to=lists@skagestad.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).