* ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device
@ 2015-03-30 20:59 Martin
2015-03-31 17:37 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Martin @ 2015-03-30 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Help welcomed...
Trying to delete one device from a btrfs raid1 across 3 devices gives
for my example:
btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2
ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for
device
That part of the filesystem is:
Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 192.45GiB
devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5
devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5
devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5
All on: 3.14.10-gentoo
Before I do a mega-yank-up to the 3.18 kernel, is the above a known
problem or am I missing something?
(Device delete needed due to that device throwing sector errors :-( )
Thanks,
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-03-30 20:59 ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device Martin @ 2015-03-31 17:37 ` David Sterba 2015-03-31 18:11 ` Martin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: David Sterba @ 2015-03-31 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin; +Cc: linux-btrfs On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:59:05PM +0100, Martin wrote: > btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 > > ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for > device Strange, that would mean that the ioctl number is not handled at all. I haven't found any change in device delete on the userspace side. This would mean that /mnt/data2 is not mounted. Did you try to do lazy unmount? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-03-31 17:37 ` David Sterba @ 2015-03-31 18:11 ` Martin 2015-04-01 7:06 ` Anand Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin @ 2015-03-31 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs On 31/03/15 18:37, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:59:05PM +0100, Martin wrote: >> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >> >> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for >> device > > Strange, that would mean that the ioctl number is not handled at all. I > haven't found any change in device delete on the userspace side. This > would mean that /mnt/data2 is not mounted. Did you try to do lazy > unmount? Nope, that filesystem is still mounted and in use, but still a very good deduction... Trying smartmonctl just now on that drive (/dev/sdf) gives errors suggesting that the drive is no longer responding at all :-( There is also a steady repeat of: kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdf] CDB: kernel: cdb[0]=0x2a: 2a 00 04 02 45 80 00 00 08 00 kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdf] Unhandled error code kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdf] kernel: Result: hostbyte=0x04 driverbyte=0x00 (Must watch that lot doesn't fill the log.) Should I try a: btrfs device delete missing /mnt/data2 or do I need to unmount or remount first? ... And the system is live and not to be rebooted if at all possible until the weekend... Thanks, Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-03-31 18:11 ` Martin @ 2015-04-01 7:06 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-01 10:54 ` Martin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Anand Jain @ 2015-04-01 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin, linux-btrfs >>> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >>> >>> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for >>> device very strange. 'btrfs fi show -m' shows btrfs fs(s) that are mounted. - Anand ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-01 7:06 ` Anand Jain @ 2015-04-01 10:54 ` Martin 2015-04-01 13:15 ` Anand Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin @ 2015-04-01 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs On 01/04/15 08:06, Anand Jain wrote: > >>>> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >>>> >>>> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for >>>> device > > very strange. 'btrfs fi show -m' shows btrfs fs(s) that are mounted. Looks like my /dev/sdf isn't responding with anything useful at all... A firmware crash?... (This is for a 256GB SSD.) # btrfs fi show -m [...] Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.31GiB devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 btrfs-progs v3.19.1 # smartctl -i /dev/sdf smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.14.10-gentoo_s03a_11] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Vendor: /7:0:0:0 Product: Compliance: SPC-5 User Capacity: 600,332,565,813,390,450 bytes [600 PB] Logical block size: 774843950 bytes scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 bd_len=46 scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 bd_len=46 >> Terminate command early due to bad response to IEC mode page A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more '-T permissive' options. And btrfs is still running ok so far... I'll be swapping that device at the weekend. (First chance I have for a Sunday shutdown. :-( ) Still... For administering btrfs, it is a little disturbing not to be able to remove/delete a device unless that device is both mounted and working... Or is that where the "missing" option comes in? Comments welcomed, Thanks, Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-01 10:54 ` Martin @ 2015-04-01 13:15 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-01 17:28 ` Martin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Anand Jain @ 2015-04-01 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin, linux-btrfs Looks like an option to use devid to delete a device would have mitigated the issue. Also the error reported is no where near the reality. Will fix them. Thanks for reporting. Anand On 04/01/2015 06:54 PM, Martin wrote: > On 01/04/15 08:06, Anand Jain wrote: >> >>>>> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl for >>>>> device >> >> very strange. 'btrfs fi show -m' shows btrfs fs(s) that are mounted. > > Looks like my /dev/sdf isn't responding with anything useful at all... A > firmware crash?... (This is for a 256GB SSD.) > > > # btrfs fi show -m > > [...] > > Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.31GiB > devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 > devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 > devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 > > > btrfs-progs v3.19.1 > > > > # smartctl -i /dev/sdf > smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.14.10-gentoo_s03a_11] > (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org > > === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === > Vendor: /7:0:0:0 > Product: > Compliance: SPC-5 > User Capacity: 600,332,565,813,390,450 bytes [600 PB] > Logical block size: 774843950 bytes > scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 > bd_len=46 > scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 > bd_len=46 >>> Terminate command early due to bad response to IEC mode page > A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more > '-T permissive' options. > > > > And btrfs is still running ok so far... I'll be swapping that device at > the weekend. (First chance I have for a Sunday shutdown. :-( ) > > > Still... For administering btrfs, it is a little disturbing not to be > able to remove/delete a device unless that device is both mounted and > working... > > Or is that where the "missing" option comes in? > > > > Comments welcomed, > > Thanks, > Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-01 13:15 ` Anand Jain @ 2015-04-01 17:28 ` Martin 2015-04-06 13:32 ` Anand Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin @ 2015-04-01 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs Anand, Thanks for picking up. The devid option sounds good. Thanks, Martin On 01/04/15 14:15, Anand Jain wrote: > > > Looks like an option to use devid to delete a device would > have mitigated the issue. Also the error reported is no > where near the reality. Will fix them. > > Thanks for reporting. > > Anand > > > On 04/01/2015 06:54 PM, Martin wrote: >> On 01/04/15 08:06, Anand Jain wrote: >>> >>>>>> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl >>>>>> for >>>>>> device >>> >>> very strange. 'btrfs fi show -m' shows btrfs fs(s) that are mounted. >> >> Looks like my /dev/sdf isn't responding with anything useful at all... A >> firmware crash?... (This is for a 256GB SSD.) >> >> >> # btrfs fi show -m >> >> [...] >> >> Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 >> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.31GiB >> devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 >> devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 >> devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 >> >> >> btrfs-progs v3.19.1 >> >> >> >> # smartctl -i /dev/sdf >> smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.14.10-gentoo_s03a_11] >> (local build) >> Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, >> www.smartmontools.org >> >> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === >> Vendor: /7:0:0:0 >> Product: >> Compliance: SPC-5 >> User Capacity: 600,332,565,813,390,450 bytes [600 PB] >> Logical block size: 774843950 bytes >> scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 >> bd_len=46 >> scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 >> bd_len=46 >>>> Terminate command early due to bad response to IEC mode page >> A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more >> '-T permissive' options. >> >> >> >> And btrfs is still running ok so far... I'll be swapping that device at >> the weekend. (First chance I have for a Sunday shutdown. :-( ) >> >> >> Still... For administering btrfs, it is a little disturbing not to be >> able to remove/delete a device unless that device is both mounted and >> working... >> >> Or is that where the "missing" option comes in? >> >> >> >> Comments welcomed, >> >> Thanks, >> Martin > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-01 17:28 ` Martin @ 2015-04-06 13:32 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-07 11:41 ` Martin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Anand Jain @ 2015-04-06 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin, linux-btrfs Martin, presumably kernel failed to read SB from disk /dev/sdf5, bit strange it saw 'Inappropriate ioctl for device', logically that don't explain. Curios to know what does 'btrfs fi show -d' say ? and output of blkid if you could. The situation here is not same as destroying the SB though. Thanks, Anand On 02/04/2015 01:28, Martin wrote: > Anand, > > Thanks for picking up. > > The devid option sounds good. > > > Thanks, > Martin > > > > On 01/04/15 14:15, Anand Jain wrote: >> >> >> Looks like an option to use devid to delete a device would >> have mitigated the issue. Also the error reported is no >> where near the reality. Will fix them. >> >> Thanks for reporting. >> >> Anand >> >> >> On 04/01/2015 06:54 PM, Martin wrote: >>> On 01/04/15 08:06, Anand Jain wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> btrfs device delete /dev/sdf5 /mnt/data2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdf5' - Inappropriate ioctl >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> device >>>> >>>> very strange. 'btrfs fi show -m' shows btrfs fs(s) that are mounted. >>> >>> Looks like my /dev/sdf isn't responding with anything useful at all... A >>> firmware crash?... (This is for a 256GB SSD.) >>> >>> >>> # btrfs fi show -m >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 >>> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.31GiB >>> devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 >>> devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 >>> devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 >>> >>> >>> btrfs-progs v3.19.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> # smartctl -i /dev/sdf >>> smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.14.10-gentoo_s03a_11] >>> (local build) >>> Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, >>> www.smartmontools.org >>> >>> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === >>> Vendor: /7:0:0:0 >>> Product: >>> Compliance: SPC-5 >>> User Capacity: 600,332,565,813,390,450 bytes [600 PB] >>> Logical block size: 774843950 bytes >>> scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 >>> bd_len=46 >>> scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 >>> bd_len=46 >>>>> Terminate command early due to bad response to IEC mode page >>> A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more >>> '-T permissive' options. >>> >>> >>> >>> And btrfs is still running ok so far... I'll be swapping that device at >>> the weekend. (First chance I have for a Sunday shutdown. :-( ) >>> >>> >>> Still... For administering btrfs, it is a little disturbing not to be >>> able to remove/delete a device unless that device is both mounted and >>> working... >>> >>> Or is that where the "missing" option comes in? >>> >>> >>> >>> Comments welcomed, >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-06 13:32 ` Anand Jain @ 2015-04-07 11:41 ` Martin 2015-04-13 15:06 ` Anand Jain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Martin @ 2015-04-07 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs On 06/04/15 14:32, Anand Jain wrote: > btrfs fi show -d That gives: # btrfs fi show -d warning, device 3 is missing warning devid 3 not found already warning, device 3 is missing warning devid 3 not found already Label: 'btrfs_root' uuid: 92452e9a-2775-45c4-922c-f01b2afd51c2 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 30.94GiB devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sda4 devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdc4 devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sde4 Label: 'btrfs_data' uuid: d1b96638-be89-4291-8a40-f2f2e1dc5223 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 95.74GiB devid 1 size 87.24GiB used 86.48GiB path /dev/sda5 devid 2 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sdc5 devid 3 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sde5 Label: 'btrfs_root2' uuid: 62603ce8-c333-4ca7-92f7-f8bdd712ab37 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 151.60MiB devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdb4 devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdd4 *** Some devices missing Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.34GiB devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 *** Some devices missing btrfs-progs v3.19.1 And without the "-d": # btrfs fi show Label: 'btrfs_root' uuid: 92452e9a-2775-45c4-922c-f01b2afd51c2 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 30.94GiB devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sda4 devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdc4 devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sde4 Label: 'btrfs_data' uuid: d1b96638-be89-4291-8a40-f2f2e1dc5223 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 95.74GiB devid 1 size 87.24GiB used 86.48GiB path /dev/sda5 devid 2 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sdc5 devid 3 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sde5 Label: 'btrfs_root2' uuid: 62603ce8-c333-4ca7-92f7-f8bdd712ab37 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 151.60MiB devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdb4 devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdd4 devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdf4 Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.34GiB devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 btrfs-progs v3.19.1 Interestingly, all the log messages about /dev/sdf are now no longer being repeated. (And nope, not had a chance to swap that disk yet!) Hence, should I do a "btrfs device delete missing /mnt/data2"? Cheers, Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device 2015-04-07 11:41 ` Martin @ 2015-04-13 15:06 ` Anand Jain 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Anand Jain @ 2015-04-13 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin, linux-btrfs Thanks Martin for helping with the data. Unfortunately no matter what I try I couldn't reproduce the "Inappropriate ioctl for device" But I got INVALD which is wrong as well. So I sent a patch for that. EIO is appropriate in this case. Next, Passing a devid to delete a device - yes it would help patch is ready in my WS BUT - just noticed that error handling code nicely put the FS into readonly when there is commit failure so that's something which should be fixed along with this patch which I am attempting. Since as in your case with 3 disks raid1, your reconstructed radi1 will still be considered as healthy after taking out a disk. Further, to recover from your situation you could try replace, that will work. OR if you are not planning to add another disk then, try this: (sorry needs a down time) umount remove failed disk from the system mount -o degrade btrfs dev del missing <mnt> mount -o remount (I hope you would check / mange the space availably part) (By the way, those missing messages are user land fabricated, btrfs-progs: 206efb60cbe3049e0d44c6da3c1909aeee18f813 so don't depend on that, to know what kernel knows probably you need /proc/fs/btrfs/devlist or sysfs posted in the ML before, btrfs fi show -m was written so to know actual kernel visibility but it was again crippled by above commit id. David, should back out 206efb60cbe3049e0d44c6da3c1909aeee18f813 as mentioned before it will help. On 04/07/2015 07:41 PM, Martin wrote: > On 06/04/15 14:32, Anand Jain wrote: >> btrfs fi show -d > > > That gives: > > # btrfs fi show -d > warning, device 3 is missing > warning devid 3 not found already > warning, device 3 is missing > warning devid 3 not found already David, As commented before - you shouldn't have integrated the patch 915902c5002485fb13d27c4b699a73fb66cc0f09 Thanks, Anand > Label: 'btrfs_root' uuid: 92452e9a-2775-45c4-922c-f01b2afd51c2 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 30.94GiB > devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sda4 > devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdc4 > devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sde4 > > Label: 'btrfs_data' uuid: d1b96638-be89-4291-8a40-f2f2e1dc5223 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 95.74GiB > devid 1 size 87.24GiB used 86.48GiB path /dev/sda5 > devid 2 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sdc5 > devid 3 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sde5 > > Label: 'btrfs_root2' uuid: 62603ce8-c333-4ca7-92f7-f8bdd712ab37 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 151.60MiB > devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdb4 > devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdd4 > *** Some devices missing > > Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.34GiB > devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 > devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 > *** Some devices missing > > btrfs-progs v3.19.1 > > > And without the "-d": > > # btrfs fi show > Label: 'btrfs_root' uuid: 92452e9a-2775-45c4-922c-f01b2afd51c2 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 30.94GiB > devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sda4 > devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdc4 > devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sde4 > > Label: 'btrfs_data' uuid: d1b96638-be89-4291-8a40-f2f2e1dc5223 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 95.74GiB > devid 1 size 87.24GiB used 86.48GiB path /dev/sda5 > devid 2 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sdc5 > devid 3 size 87.24GiB used 87.24GiB path /dev/sde5 > > Label: 'btrfs_root2' uuid: 62603ce8-c333-4ca7-92f7-f8bdd712ab37 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 151.60MiB > devid 1 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdb4 > devid 2 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdd4 > devid 3 size 24.00GiB used 24.00GiB path /dev/sdf4 > > Label: 'btrfs_data2' uuid: 3aaee716-b98b-4c86-ba5a-53456994f152 > Total devices 3 FS bytes used 159.34GiB > devid 1 size 206.47GiB used 206.02GiB path /dev/sdb5 > devid 2 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdd5 > devid 3 size 206.47GiB used 206.47GiB path /dev/sdf5 > > btrfs-progs v3.19.1 > > > Interestingly, all the log messages about /dev/sdf are now no longer > being repeated. > > (And nope, not had a chance to swap that disk yet!) > > > Hence, should I do a "btrfs device delete missing /mnt/data2"? > > Cheers, > Martin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-13 15:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-03-30 20:59 ERROR: error removing the device '/dev/sdXN' - Inappropriate ioctl for device Martin 2015-03-31 17:37 ` David Sterba 2015-03-31 18:11 ` Martin 2015-04-01 7:06 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-01 10:54 ` Martin 2015-04-01 13:15 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-01 17:28 ` Martin 2015-04-06 13:32 ` Anand Jain 2015-04-07 11:41 ` Martin 2015-04-13 15:06 ` Anand Jain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).