From: Philip Seeger <p0h0i0l0i0p@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Got 10 csum errors according to dmesg but 0 errors according to dev stats
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 16:58:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554F7232.9080804@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554F6D43.2060806@googlemail.com>
Forgot to mention kernel version: Linux 4.0.1-1-ARCH
$ sudo btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 3e8973d3-83ce-4d93-8d50-2989c0be256a
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 19.87GiB
devid 1 size 45.00GiB used 21.03GiB path /dev/sda1
btrfs-progs v3.19.1
On 05/10/2015 04:37 PM, Philip Seeger wrote:
> I have installed a new virtual machine (VirtualBox) with Arch on btrfs
> (just a root fs and swap partition, no other partitions).
> I suddenly noticed 10 checksum errors in the kernel log:
> $ dmesg | grep csum
> [ 736.283506] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1704363 off
> 761856 csum 1145980813 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 736.283605] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1704363 off
> 1146880 csum 1961240434 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 745.583064] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1704346 off
> 393216 csum 4035064017 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 752.324899] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1705927 off
> 2125824 csum 3638986839 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 752.333115] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1705927 off
> 2588672 csum 176788087 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 752.333303] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1705927 off
> 3276800 csum 1891435134 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 752.333397] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1705927 off
> 3964928 csum 3304112727 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 2761.889460] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1705927 off
> 2125824 csum 3638986839 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 9054.226022] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1704363 off
> 761856 csum 1145980813 expected csum 2566472073
> [ 9054.226106] BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed ino 1704363 off
> 1146880 csum 1961240434 expected csum 2566472073
>
> This is a new vm, it hasn't crashed (which might have caused filesystem
> corruption). The virtual disk is on a RAID storage on the host, which is
> healthy. All corrupted files are Firefox data files:
> $ dmesg | grep csum | grep -Eo 'csum failed ino [0-9]* ' | awk '{print
> $4}' | xargs -I{} find -inum {}
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/cookies.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/cookies.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/webappsstore.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/places.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/places.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/places.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/places.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/places.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/cookies.sqlite
> ./.mozilla/firefox/nfh217zw.default/cookies.sqlite
>
> How could this possibly happen?
>
> And more importantly: Why doesn't the btrfs stat(u)s output tell me that
> errors have occurred?
> $ sudo btrfs dev stats /
> [/dev/sda1].write_io_errs 0
> [/dev/sda1].read_io_errs 0
> [/dev/sda1].flush_io_errs 0
> [/dev/sda1].corruption_errs 0
> [/dev/sda1].generation_errs 0
>
> If the filesystem health was monitored using btrfs dev stats (cronjob)
> (like checking a zpool using zpool status), the admin would not have
> been notified:
> $ sudo btrfs dev stats / | grep -v 0 -c
> 0
>
> Is my understanding of the stats command wrong, does "corruption_errs"
> not mean corruption errors?
>
>
>
--
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-10 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-10 14:37 Got 10 csum errors according to dmesg but 0 errors according to dev stats Philip Seeger
2015-05-10 14:58 ` Philip Seeger [this message]
[not found] ` <CABR0jERqzkdTJxX_1S5WEZHDzX8=O8P7r+Bk0mesPLsR2n=w8A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-10 17:32 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-11 1:41 ` Russell Coker
2015-05-12 0:14 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-12 1:04 ` Paul Jones
2015-05-12 1:37 ` Chris Murphy
2015-05-15 18:40 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-15 18:33 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-17 1:53 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-17 8:19 ` Duncan
2015-05-17 8:36 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-05-17 8:57 ` Duncan
2015-05-23 12:49 ` Philip Seeger
2015-05-23 16:52 ` Duncan
2015-05-27 20:25 ` Philip Seeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554F7232.9080804@googlemail.com \
--to=p0h0i0l0i0p@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).