linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce offline fsid/chunk tree uuid change for btrfstune.
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:00:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55517ADC.6000300@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555160DF.9050902@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 05/12/2015 10:09 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce offline fsid/chunk tree uuid change
> for btrfstune.
> From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
> To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: 2015年05月12日 00:24
>
>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> Respecting the current syntax, the way to set the uuid is:
>>>>
>>>>    btrfs prop set -t filesytem /dev/sdx uuid ...UUID...
>>>>
>>>> In this special case, the property handler should check if the
>>>> device is
>>>> unmounted (and is a btrfs filesystem) and then do the rest.
>>> This is one good idea, but I'm afraid it may still be confusing.
>>> And things may get even worse when we try to move everything into
>>> btrfs-prop,
>>> E.g. if we auto move seeding flag to prop, we must give a quite detailed
>>> explain on which property is offline.
>>>
>>> So I prefer to add a new type called offline, and put uuid change with
>>> other btrfstune function into this type.
>>> IMHO this should provide a good explain on which is online and which is
>>> offline.
>>>
>>> How do you think about this method?
>>
>> I don't think that 'offline' is a good choice. The type should denote
>> the modified object, ie device, inode, filesystem. What's 'offline' in
>> this context?
> Right, 'offline' type here is just a easy trick for me to code, not a
> meaningful type.
>>
>> The property interface can be used to modify other features both for
>> mounted and unmounted filesystem, I agree that this should be done in a
>> way that's not confusing. There are operations that are allowed on an
>> unmounted fs (seeding), mounted + unmounted (extref feature) etc. so I
>> think we could add options like --check-unmounted that would not allow
>> to act on a mounted filesystem.
>
> Nice idea, but i prefer a option like "--offline" to enable the usage of
> offline operations.
> E.g, for normal online operations, nothing is changed.
>
> And for "btrfs prop set <DEV> uuid <UUID>", "--offline" must be
> specified to work.
> Or a message will be output to info user.
>
> What about this one?


Qu, Thanks for the feature.

Qu/David,

  I strongly recommend this feature to be part of btrfstune as
  of now, as originally planned by Qu. When its time to move
  to btrfs cli we could. If we do it wrongly now it would stay
  there forever.

  We could take better call, when all the features of progs are
  in place.

Thanks, Anand

> Thanks,
> Qu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-12  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05  6:16 [PATCH 0/8] Introduce offline fsid/chunk tree uuid change for btrfstune Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs-progs: Allow open_ctree to ignore fsid mismatch Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs-progs: Export write_tree_block() Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs-progs: Introduce change_header_uuid() function Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs-progs: Introduce change_extents_uuid() function Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs-progs: Introduce function change_device_uuid() Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs-progs: Introduce change_devices_uuid() function Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs-progs: Introduce change_uuid() function Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05  6:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs-progs: btrfstune: Introduce new "-u" and "-U" options Qu Wenruo
2015-05-05 15:20 ` [PATCH 0/8] Introduce offline fsid/chunk tree uuid change for btrfstune David Sterba
2015-05-06  0:49   ` Qu Wenruo
2015-05-06 15:43     ` David Sterba
2015-05-08  8:57       ` Qu Wenruo
2015-05-11 16:24         ` David Sterba
2015-05-12  2:09           ` Qu Wenruo
2015-05-12  4:00             ` Anand Jain [this message]
2015-05-13  0:54               ` Qu Wenruo
2015-05-13 13:43               ` David Sterba
2015-05-15 15:42                 ` Anand Jain
2015-05-21 16:30                   ` David Sterba
2015-05-22 15:20                     ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55517ADC.6000300@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).