public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingvar Bogdahn <ingvar.bogdahn@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: CoW with webserver databases: innodb_file_per_table and dedicated tables for blobs?
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:34:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557E9C2B.9030404@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello there,

I'm planing to use btrfs for a medium-sized webserver. It is commonly 
recommended to set nodatacow for database files to avoid performance 
degradation. However, apparently nodatacow disables some of my main 
motivations of using btrfs : checksumming and (probably) incremental 
backups with send/receive (please correct me if I'm wrong on this). 
Also, the databases are among the most important data on my webserver, 
so it is particularly there that I would like those feature working.

My question is, are there strategies to avoid nodatacow of databases 
that are suitable and safe in a production server?
I thought about the following:
- in mysql/mariadb: setting "innodb_file_per_table" should avoid having 
few very big database files.
- in mysql/mariadb: adapting database schema to store blobs into 
dedicated tables.
- btrfs: set autodefrag or some cron job to regularly defrag only 
database fails to avoid performance degradation due to fragmentation
- turn on compression on either btrfs or mariadb

Is this likely to give me ok-ish performance? What other possibilities 
are there?

Thanks for your recommendations.

ingvar

             reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15  9:34 Ingvar Bogdahn [this message]
2015-06-15  9:57 ` CoW with webserver databases: innodb_file_per_table and dedicated tables for blobs? Hugo Mills
2015-06-16  7:06   ` Ingvar Bogdahn
2015-06-16  8:49     ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2015-06-16  9:32     ` Hugo Mills

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557E9C2B.9030404@gmail.com \
    --to=ingvar.bogdahn@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox