From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:12663 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797AbbFZCqr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:46:47 -0400 Message-ID: <558CBD04.8060204@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:46:28 +0800 From: wangyf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Omar Sandoval CC: Ed Tomlinson , , Miao Xie , Zhao Lei , Philip Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Btrfs: RAID 5/6 missing device scrub+replace References: <5588CD54.9050405@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150624041310.GA26148@huxley.DHCP.TheFacebook.com> <5cfdd3e8-e9ba-4b3a-a858-49f6a36f18de@aei.ca> <558B8BBD.2010004@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150625163507.GA24394@huxley.DHCP.TheFacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20150625163507.GA24394@huxley.DHCP.TheFacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tested-by: Wang Yanfeng On 06/26/2015 12:35 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:03:57PM +0800, wangyf wrote: >> I confirmed this bug report, and found the reason is that >> I compiled the patched module with a dirty kernel. >> This morning I tested this patch again, and didn't see above error, this >> patch is OK. >> Sorry for this bug report. : ( > It's no problem! Do either of you feel like providing your Tested-by? >