From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.153.30]:37314 "EHLO mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752281AbbGFUxs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:53:48 -0400 Subject: Re: size 2.73TiB used 240.97GiB after balance To: Donald Pearson , Hugo Mills , Hendrik Friedel , Btrfs BTRFS References: <559AD4E5.2030107@friedels.name> <559ADAB5.3050804@friedels.name> <20150706194932.GE10539@carfax.org.uk> From: Omar Sandoval Message-ID: <559AEAAB.4070401@fb.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:52:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/06/2015 01:01 PM, Donald Pearson wrote: > Based on my experience Hugo's advice is critical, get the bad drive > out of the pool when in raid56 and do not try to replace or delete it > while it's still attached and recognized. > > If you add a new device, mount degraded and rebalance. If you don't, > mount degraded then device delete missing. > Watch out, replacing a missing device in RAID 5/6 currently doesn't work and will cause a kernel BUG(). See my patch series here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg44874.html -- Omar