From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Martin <sha256sum@gmail.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why subvolume and not just volume?
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:23:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C1BA0A.8090804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK4jXzy8OpRMnF=hYEamZVxiumH9Xn_8uDo_xOQhYfLf3cA9dA@mail.gmail.com>
Martin wrote on 2015/08/05 09:06 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know the reason subvolumes are not called just volumes? I
> mean, the top subvolume is not called a volume, so there is nothing to
> be "sub" of.
Because normally a volume is referred as a complete filesystem.
So from this respect, subvolume is not a full filesystem, it still need
a lot of extra data from other trees to build its contents.
So, that's why there is "sub" prefix.
Although it acts much like a volume as it can be mounted like a
filesystem, but it's still not a full filesystem.
>
> Also, what is the penalty of a subvolume compared to a directory? From
> a design perspective, couldn't all directories just be subvolumes?
Yes, subvolume has its overhead, and when it comes as many as
directories, the overhead won't be small.
The overhead that I can remember is shown below.
Use empty tree as an example for its size, and default mkfs options.
The '+' after number means it will increase with snapshots
1) Empty tree block: 16K
Of course takes more if its child file/dir grows
2) ROOT_ITEM in tree root: 439bytes
3) ROOT_BACKREF in tree root: 22+bytes
5) extent backref for tree block:
33+bytes for skinny metadata
53+bytes without skinny metadata
Alone with other trees like log tree, one for each subvolume if fsync is
called.
Not to mention other run-time overhead.
For example, to search a inode in one subvolume.
Search_slot would be enough to find the INODE_ITEM.
But to search a inode across subvolume boundary, need to first found the
subvolume boundary and loop until we reach the subvolume containing the
inode, then do the above search_slot to locate the INODE_ITEM.
Although the overhead is already small, but not that small to make all
directories to be subvolume.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Martin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 7:06 Why subvolume and not just volume? Martin
2015-08-05 7:23 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-08-05 17:13 ` David Sterba
2015-08-06 7:23 ` Duncan
2015-08-06 11:17 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C1BA0A.8090804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sha256sum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox