From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Hendrik Friedel <hendrik@friedels.name>,
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Data single *and* raid?
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:26:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C40957.9040209@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C3AE34.8050804@friedels.name>
Hendrik Friedel wrote on 2015/08/06 20:57 +0200:
> Hello Hugo,
> hello Chris,
>
> thanks for your advice. Now I am here:
> btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=raid1
> /mnt/__Complete_Disk/
> Done, had to relocate 0 out of 3939 chunks
>
>
> root@homeserver:/mnt/__Complete_Disk# btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.78TiB
> devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.72TiB path /dev/sde
> devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.23TiB path /dev/sdc
> devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdd
>
> btrfs-progs v4.1.1
>
>
> So, that looks good.
>
> But then:
> root@homeserver:/mnt/__Complete_Disk# btrfs fi df /mnt/__Complete_Disk/
> Data, RAID5: total=3.83TiB, used=3.78TiB
> System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=576.00KiB
> Metadata, RAID5: total=6.46GiB, used=4.84GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
GlobalReserve is not a chunk type, it just means a range of metadata
reserved for overcommiting.
And it's always single.
Personally, I don't think it should be output in "fi df" command, as
it's in a higher level than chunk.
At least for your case, nothing is needed to worry about.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Is the RAID5 expected here?
> I did not yet run:
> btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5,soft -mconvert=raid5,soft
> /mnt/new_storage/
>
> Regards,
> Hendrik
>
>
> On 01.08.2015 22:44, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I converted an array to raid5 by
>>>> btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
>>>> btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
>>>> btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
>>>>
>>>> The Balance went through. But now:
>>>> Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
>>>> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 5.28TiB
>>>> devid 1 size 2.73TiB used 2.57TiB path /dev/sde
>>>> devid 2 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdc
>>>> devid 3 size 2.73TiB used 2.73TiB path /dev/sdd
>>>> btrfs-progs v4.1.1
>>>>
>>>> Already the 2.57TiB is a bit surprising:
>>>> root@homeserver:/mnt# btrfs fi df /mnt/new_storage/
>>>> Data, single: total=2.55TiB, used=2.55TiB
>>>> Data, RAID5: total=2.73TiB, used=2.72TiB
>>>> System, RAID5: total=32.00MiB, used=736.00KiB
>>>> Metadata, RAID1: total=6.00GiB, used=5.33GiB
>>>> Metadata, RAID5: total=3.00GiB, used=2.99GiB
>>>
>>> Looking at the btrfs fi show output, you've probably run out of
>>> space during the conversion, probably due to an uneven distribution of
>>> the original "single" chunks.
>>>
>>> I think I would suggest balancing the single chunks, and trying the
>>> conversion (of the unconverted parts) again:
>>>
>>> # btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofile=raid1
>>> /mnt/new_storage/
>>> # btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5,soft -mconvert=raid5,soft
>>> /mnt/new_storage/
>>>
>>
>> Yep I bet that's it also. btrfs fi usage might be better at exposing
>> this case.
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-01 20:09 Data single *and* raid? Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-01 20:24 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 20:32 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-01 20:44 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 21:45 ` Duncan
2015-08-01 22:26 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-01 22:34 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-02 0:27 ` Duncan
2015-08-02 1:14 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-02 3:46 ` Duncan
2015-08-02 18:31 ` Chris Murphy
2015-08-02 19:06 ` Hugo Mills
2015-08-02 12:54 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-06 18:57 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-07 1:26 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-08-07 5:16 ` Hendrik Friedel
2015-08-07 6:25 ` Duncan
2015-08-07 8:11 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C40957.9040209@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hendrik@friedels.name \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox