linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <clm@fb.com>, <jbacik@fb.com>, <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>,
	<dsterba@suse.cz>, <chandan@mykolab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 11:08:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C4212E.90609@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438855819-4328-2-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Chanda,

Thanks for your effort to implement sub pagesize block size.

These cleanups look quite good, but still some small readablity 
recommendation inlined below.

Chandan Rajendra wrote on 2015/08/06 15:40 +0530:
> Currently, the code reserves/releases extents in multiples of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
> units. Fix this by doing reservation/releases in block size units.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/file.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 795d754..e3b2b3c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -1362,16 +1362,19 @@ fail:
>   static noinline int
>   lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct inode *inode, struct page **pages,
>   				size_t num_pages, loff_t pos,
> +				size_t write_bytes,
>   				u64 *lockstart, u64 *lockend,
>   				struct extent_state **cached_state)
>   {
> +	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
>   	u64 start_pos;
>   	u64 last_pos;
>   	int i;
>   	int ret = 0;
>
> -	start_pos = pos & ~((u64)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> -	last_pos = start_pos + ((u64)num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
> +	start_pos = pos & ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
Why not just roundown(pos, root->sectorisze)
Hard coded align is never that easy to read.

> +	last_pos = start_pos
> +		+ ALIGN(pos + write_bytes - start_pos, root->sectorsize) - 1;
Maybe just a preference problem, I'd prefer to use round_down other than
ALIGN, as sometimes I still need to figure out if it is round_down or 
round_down.
>
>   	if (start_pos < inode->i_size) {
>   		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> @@ -1489,6 +1492,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
>
>   	while (iov_iter_count(i) > 0) {
>   		size_t offset = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> +		size_t sector_offset;
>   		size_t write_bytes = min(iov_iter_count(i),
>   					 nrptrs * (size_t)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
>   					 offset);
> @@ -1497,6 +1501,8 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
>   		size_t reserve_bytes;
>   		size_t dirty_pages;
>   		size_t copied;
> +		size_t dirty_sectors;
> +		size_t num_sectors;
>
>   		WARN_ON(num_pages > nrptrs);
>
> @@ -1509,8 +1515,12 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
>   			break;
>   		}
>
> -		reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +		sector_offset = pos & (root->sectorsize - 1);
Same here.

Thanks,
Qu
> +		reserve_bytes = ALIGN(write_bytes + sector_offset,
> +				root->sectorsize);
> +
>   		ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, reserve_bytes, write_bytes);
> +
>   		if (ret == -ENOSPC &&
>   		    (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & (BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW |
>   					      BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC))) {
> @@ -1523,7 +1533,9 @@ static noinline ssize_t __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,
>   				 */
>   				num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes + offset,
>   							 PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> -				reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +				reserve_bytes = ALIGN(write_bytes + sector_offset,
> +						root->sectorsize);
> +
>   				ret = 0;
>   			} else {
>   				ret = -ENOSPC;
> @@ -1558,8 +1570,8 @@ again:
>   			break;
>
>   		ret = lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(inode, pages, num_pages,
> -						      pos, &lockstart, &lockend,
> -						      &cached_state);
> +						pos, write_bytes, &lockstart,
> +						&lockend, &cached_state);
>   		if (ret < 0) {
>   			if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>   				goto again;
> @@ -1595,9 +1607,14 @@ again:
>   		 * we still have an outstanding extent for the chunk we actually
>   		 * managed to copy.
>   		 */
> -		if (num_pages > dirty_pages) {
> -			release_bytes = (num_pages - dirty_pages) <<
> -				PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +		num_sectors = reserve_bytes >> inode->i_blkbits;
> +		dirty_sectors = round_up(copied + sector_offset,
> +					root->sectorsize);
> +		dirty_sectors >>= inode->i_blkbits;
> +
> +		if (num_sectors > dirty_sectors) {
> +			release_bytes = (write_bytes - copied)
> +				& ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
>   			if (copied > 0) {
>   				spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
>   				BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++;
> @@ -1611,7 +1628,7 @@ again:
>   							     release_bytes);
>   		}
>
> -		release_bytes = dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +		release_bytes = ALIGN(copied + sector_offset, root->sectorsize);
>
>   		if (copied > 0)
>   			ret = btrfs_dirty_pages(root, inode, pages,
> @@ -1632,8 +1649,7 @@ again:
>
>   		if (only_release_metadata && copied > 0) {
>   			lockstart = round_down(pos, root->sectorsize);
> -			lockend = lockstart +
> -				(dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
> +			lockend = round_up(pos + copied, root->sectorsize) - 1;
>
>   			set_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
>   				       lockend, EXTENT_NORESERVE, NULL,
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-07  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-06 10:10 [PATCH 00/11] Btrfs: Pre subpagesize-blocksize cleanups Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-07  3:08   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-08-07  4:16     ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] Btrfs: Compute and look up csums based on sectorsized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 03/11] Btrfs: Direct I/O read: Work " Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 04/11] Btrfs: fallocate: Work with " Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 05/11] Btrfs: btrfs_page_mkwrite: Reserve space in sectorsized units Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 06/11] Btrfs: Search for all ordered extents that could span across a page Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 07/11] Btrfs: Use (eb->start, seq) as search key for tree modification log Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 08/11] Btrfs: btrfs_submit_direct_hook: Handle map_length < bio vector length Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] Btrfs: Limit inline extents to root->sectorsize Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] Btrfs: Fix block size returned to user space Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] Btrfs: Clean pte corresponding to page straddling i_size Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C4212E.90609@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chandan@mykolab.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).