From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:32908 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752987AbbHMOgF (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:36:05 -0400 Message-ID: <55CCAB4A.6010905@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:35:54 +0800 From: Anand Jain MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fdmanana@gmail.com CC: fstests@vger.kernel.org, "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfstests: btrfs: test device delete with EIO on src dev References: <1430388527-16700-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <1430852599-22724-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <1430852599-22724-4-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Filipe, > Any reason to not run here fsstress like the test from patch 2? Doing > the device delete with a non-empty fs is a lot more interesting and > can help find bugs and regressions in the future. You are reviewing v2. fsstress was added in v4. >> Also this test needs the latest btrfs-progs and kernel patch > > Not patch, but patch set instead. I was looking for a patch with that > title and didn't found any, only a cover letter with the subject: > "[PATCH 0/8 v2] device delete by devid". > >> under title >> [PATCH] device delete by devid will update comments. >> When this patch is not found in the btrfs-progs, this test >> will not run. However when the require patch is not found >> in the kernel it will fail gracefully. > > What's the status of these patches (both kernel and btrfs-progs)? I've > noticed they've been around since april and no feedback on the mailing > list. Thanks, Anand