From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:48808 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755101AbbIWUjW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0044008 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t8NKZM1D023505 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:39:21 -0700 Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([199.201.64.23]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1x41trrjkc-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:39:21 -0700 Subject: Re: FYIO: A rant about btrfs To: References: <20150916144355.GA1285@invalid> From: Josef Bacik Message-ID: <56030DF7.3080400@fb.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150916144355.GA1285@invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/16/2015 10:43 AM, M G Berberich wrote: > Hello, > > just for information. I stumbled about a rant about btrfs-performance: > Found this through reddit, I'm reproducing some of his issues artificially, he's definitely run into some real bugs that aren't related to "databases suck on btrfs." Thanks, Josef