linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: wow!
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:12:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <562C3AA7.9060007@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I upgraded to linux-4.2.3 and btrfs-progs-4.2.3 yesterday, and wow, 
there must have been bigger between linux-4.1.10 and 4.2.3 than were 
mentioned in the changelog!  I've been testing btrfs on a Thinkpad X200 
with an i5-2450M, Intel 320 SSD, and 8GB of RAM for over a year now, 
since when when linux-3.16 and btrfs-progs-3.17 were very new. 
Performance had been steadily degrading, or hit or miss (I'm not sure if 
defrag or fstrim actually work...), but stability was getting better.

The regular use case I use a benchmark is how fast the backup goes.  If 
the numbers seem unusual, I'll reboot and run:

tar cf- /.snapshots/only_one_snapshot | pv -pabet > /dev/null
then reboot and run
btrfs send /.snapshots/only_one_snapshot | pv -pabet > /dev/null

The worst run I've seen this last year for both of these commands~60 
MiB/s throughput to /dev/null...

A year ago, when the file system was brand new, after I filled the fs 
with my regular data, the average was:
GNU tar: ~125 MiB/s
BSD tar: ~129 MiB/s
btrfs send: ~140 MiB/s

Now with linux-4.2.3 and btrfs-progs-4.2.3:
GNU tar: ~134 MiB/s
BSD tar: ~129 MiB/s
btrfs send: ~133 MiB/s

This is the first time a backup has run at the speed of a fresh 
filesystem; I have not recently run fstrim or btrfs fi defrag, so I was 
very pleasantly surprised!  Thank you all very much for your hard work.

Kind regards,
Nicholas

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-10-25  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=562C3AA7.9060007@gmail.com \
    --to=nsteeves@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).