From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:37907 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752157AbbKAN6T (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2015 08:58:19 -0500 Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so35418919wic.1 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 05:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (p50887086.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [80.136.112.134]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm17103042wjv.45.2015.11.01.05.58.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Nov 2015 05:58:17 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Seeger Subject: Re: Crash during mount -o degraded, kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2044 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <5635140F.7040206@googlemail.com> <5635508A.4080401@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <56361A79.7000301@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:58:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/01/2015 04:22 AM, Duncan wrote: > So what btrfs is logging to dmesg on mount here, are the historical error > counts, in this case expected as they were deliberate during your test, > nearly 200K of them, not one or more new errors. > > To have btrfs report these at the CLI, use btrfs device stats. To zero Thanks for clarifying. I forgot to check btrfs dev stats. That explains it. The 2-drive failure scenario still caused data corruption with 4.3-rc7 though. Philip