Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Olivier <vincent@up4.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs check help
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:28:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5654C86C.9080800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF79907D-A36B-4806-B31A-3E327F2E5642@up4.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1836 bytes --]

On 2015-11-24 12:06, Vincent Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Woke up this morning with a kernel panic (for which I do not have details). Please find below the output for btrfs check. Is this normal ? What should I do ? Arch Linux 4.2.5. Btrfs-utils 4.3.1. 17x4TB RAID10.
You get bonus points for being on a reasonably up-to-date kernel and 
userspace :)

This is actually a pretty tame check result for a filesystem that's been 
through kernel panic. I think everything listed here is safe for check 
to fix, but I would suggest waiting until the devs provide opinions 
before actually running with --repair.  I would also suggest comparing 
results between the different devices in the FS, if things are 
drastically different, you may have issues that check can't fix on it's own.
> [root@3dcpc5 ~]# btrfs check /dev/sdk
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdk
> UUID: 6a742786-070d-4557-9e67-c73b84967bf5
> checking extents
> checking free space cache
> checking fs roots
These next two lines are errors, but I'm not 100% certain if it's safe 
to have check fix them:
> root 5 inode 1341670 errors 400, nbytes wrong
> root 11406 inode 1341670 errors 400, nbytes wrong
This next one is also an error, and I am fairly certain that it's safe 
to have check fix as long as the number at the end is not too big.
> found 19328809638262 bytes used err is 1
The rest is just reference info
> total csum bytes: 18849042724
> total tree bytes: 27389886464
> total fs tree bytes: 4449746944
> total extent tree bytes: 3075457024
> btree space waste bytes: 2880474254
The only other thing I know that's worth mentioning is that if the 
numbers on these next two lines don't match, you may be missing some 
writes from right before the crash.
> file data blocks allocated: 19430708535296
> referenced 20123773407232




[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3019 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 17:06 btrfs check help Vincent Olivier
2015-11-24 20:28 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn [this message]
2015-11-24 20:32   ` Hugo Mills
2015-11-25 16:51     ` Vincent Olivier
2015-11-25 18:52       ` Henk Slager
2015-11-26  1:44       ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-27  3:03         ` Vincent Olivier
2015-11-27 11:25           ` Vincent Olivier
2015-11-27 16:32             ` Henk Slager
2015-11-27 20:25             ` Chris Murphy
2015-11-30  1:54             ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5654C86C.9080800@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent@up4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox