From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:50664 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751325AbbK3Fo4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:44:56 -0500 Subject: potential btrfs-progs clean up To: Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <1448453300-8449-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <5656683C.6060001@cn.fujitsu.com> <5656A18E.9050607@oracle.com> <5656AC64.3030304@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, calestyo@scientia.net, ahferroin7@gmail.com, 1i5t5.duncan@cox.net From: Anand Jain Message-ID: <565BE23C.3010400@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:44:28 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5656AC64.3030304@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (this is a different topic, updated the subject) > Totally agree with this point. Too many non-sense in btrfs-progs codes > copied from kernel, and due to lack of update, it's very buggy now. > Just check volume.c for allocating data chunk. Which functions in volume.c in particular ? Thanks, Anand